Category: NFL, Bears, Twitter, YouTube, GIF

  • Break Out the Popcorn: The Bears Are “Advancing” to Indiana

    Break Out the Popcorn: The Bears Are “Advancing” to Indiana

    Written by GP. No Abacus needed

    In which a billionaire family threatens to run away from home as the rest of us are asked to be sad about it

    Let’s start with the part the graphic in your feed is trying very hard to keep you from noticing. The Chicago Bears did not announce that they are moving to Indiana. They announced that their board of directors voted to advance — that lovely, load-bearing little verb — a stadium “development project” in Hammond, with the exact site to be selected. No site. No shovels. No closing date. A vote to keep walking toward a thing they have been walking toward, then away from, then toward again, for three years running.

    You know who said as much? The Bears’ own friends in Springfield. State Rep. Kam Buckner, who has been doing the actual work of trying to keep the team, said Kevin Warren called him the morning of the announcement to promise he’d keep talking about an Illinois stadium, and that the statement is — Buckner’s word — less definitive than the one the Bears issued back in February. State Sen. Bill Cunningham said flatly it isn’t fundamentally different from the February version either. So the franchise issued a press release announcing that it has the same feelings it had four months ago, dressed it in a board vote plus a team logo, and a whole genre of guys who think they can read a balance sheet because they own a pickup truck took it as a divorce decree.

    It isn’t a divorce decree. It’s a screenager standing in the doorway with a bloated backpack, announcing to the kitchen that this time he really means it, he’s going to go live at his friend’s house in Indiana where they actually appreciate him. And the family — the State of Illinois — has finally, blessedly, learned the correct response, which is to keep eating dinner.

    What the McCaskeys are actually mad about

    Here is the thing nobody on the angry side of the blog wants to say out loud: this is a tantrum, and we know exactly what it’s about. The Illinois legislature wrapped its spring session without handing the Bears the property-tax “certainty” — the windfall, the assurance, the blank-ish check — that the ownership group wanted. So George McCaskey and Kevin Warren, with the moneyed comfort of minority owners like Pat Ryan behind them, did the only thing a frustrated heir knows how to do when the grown-ups won’t write the number he asked for. They stomped. Publicly. In a press release written by someone who has clearly never met the South Side of Chicago.

    Because read the language again, slowly, and try not to laugh. A stadium in Hammond, they tell us, will “transform the region, connecting Northwest Indiana to the South Side of Chicago through the Loop and across neighborhoods and suburbs stretching north of the city.” It will “bring Chicagoland together.” This is the prose of a man who has been told the South Side exists but has never had a reason to drive through it. The South Side does not get connected to a stadium in Hammond. The South Side gets to watch the parking economy, the concession jobs, the game-day money that at least sprayed a few dollars onto the people who set up lots and worked the stands at Soldier Field — gets to watch all of it drive across the state line and land in Lake County, Indiana. You are not enriching the South Side of Chicago. You are trading poor people in Chicago for poor people in Munster and calling it regional synergy.

    The honeymoon, then the bill

    Now to Indiana, which is doing the most embarrassing thing in this entire saga, and that’s a competitive field. Governor Mike Braun, a man visibly thrilled to dance on Pritzker’s grave several years before anyone has died, welcomed the Bears with “Hoosiers, help me welcome the Chicago Bears to our great state!” and a promise of a partnership “as strong as the ’85 Bears defense.” Set aside that invoking a defense from forty-one years ago to sell a stadium that won’t open until 2031 is its own quiet tragedy. Focus on the structure of the deal he’s so proud of.

    Indiana has dangled up to a billion dollars in incentives to land this thing. A billion dollars of Hoosier money, committed by Republican legislators who will cut every ribbon and then be conveniently term-limited or retired by the time the real bills arrive. Because the bills will arrive. The site is industrial Northwest Indiana — Wolf Lake, the kind of acreage that comes with environmental reports, remediation questions, and a zoning gauntlet that has a long, documented habit of turning a published budget into an opening bid. My over-under on what this actually costs by the time it’s playable, with cleanup and overruns priced in, is well north of what’s on any current slide. Put your own number on it. Just make it bigger than theirs.

    And when the overruns hit — when the remediation comes in heavy, when the traffic studies demand infrastructure nobody budgeted, when the “world-class” renderings meet a marsh — who’s holding the residual? Not the McCaskeys. Not Illinois. Indiana taxpayers, and Colts fans who never asked for a second team to split their state’s football oxygen and never wanted to subsidize one. The honeymoon lasts exactly until the first invoice the renderings didn’t account for. Then it’s a five-to-eight-year boondoggle with a governor’s name on the groundbreaking and somebody else’s name on the workout.

    The part where Illinois quietly wins

    So let’s retire the bit where this proves Chicago and Springfield are corrupt and broke. Run the logic. The “corrupt Democrats” you’ve been told to despise are the ones who declined to set public money on fire to keep a billionaire’s franchise from decamping. The fiscally responsible move — the genuinely conservative move, if any of the people cheering this still remembered what that word meant — was to refuse the blank check. Illinois did that. Illinois looked at a project with a price tag that only goes one direction and said: not on our books.

    And here’s the dirty secret the McCaskeys’ press release is built to obscure: if the Bears actually go, Illinois loses a narrative and keeps its balance sheet. It eats a news cycle of “Illinois lost the Bears” and in exchange never owes a dime on a domed monument to one family’s tax grievance. The fans don’t even lose the team — Hammond is a twenty-minute drive south of Soldier Field. You can still get there. You can still tailgate. You can still watch them go 8-9 in a new building.

    Which brings me to the crude version, for the crude room: this is the rare arrangement where you get to sleep with the supermodel ten times a year and never have to date her. No anniversary. No “we need to talk about the kitchen renovation.” No co-signing the mortgage on a place near Gary that’s going to smell like Gary. Indiana just got down on one knee. Let them. Let them pay her expenses for the next three decades while Chicagoland drives down on Sundays, enjoys the view, and drives home to a city that didn’t put a cent toward the privilege.

    So: do I want them to go?

    God, yes. Go. Please go. Take the marsh. Take the billion in incentives that becomes two. Take the zoning fights, environmental delays, the Colts fans’ resentment and the governor who’ll have moved on to his next photo op by the time the first beam goes crooked. Take all of it.

    Because this statement means precisely nothing — it’s a board vote attached to a feeling, less binding than the one before it, with no site and a guy calling Springfield the same morning to keep the door propped. But on the off chance the tantrum hardens into a moving van? Break out the popcorn. The most entertaining thing the Bears have produced in a decade won’t happen on the field. It’ll happen on a financing spreadsheet in Indianapolis, in real time, for the next five to eight years.

  • Movie Monday: Wall Street at Halas.

    Movie Monday: Wall Street at Halas.

    News is still slow, unless a fan wants to dive into the shitshow that is the stadium issue.

    Here’s my overall thoughts on the topic.

    One of my friends finally attained his Masters in Biz from USC some years back. One of his final projects required him to interview a CFO or CEO of a major corp. So, he booked one from a corp that we would all instantly recognize.

    Just so happened that at the time, they were moving a lot of their infrastructure to Ireland.

    Why Ireland? Well, it wasn’t for the green beer, leprechauns and redheads, that’s for sure.

    It was for – you guessed it – cheaper taxes.
    He asked the CFO, point blank, “You’re moving for the cheaper taxes, right?”

    The CFO paused, kinda grinned, “No. It’s mostly for reason x, y and z…”

    CFO knew it was bullshit. My friend new it was bullshit. Everyone knows x, y, z was bullshit. It was lower taxes. Period.

    But of course corps fleeing the U.S. [and taking the jobs with them] isn’t exactly popular, and they don’t want any sort of bad PR or god forbid, commy boycotts of their product in the U.S. market.

    I’ll give you another example from the flip side. My uncle lived in Texas and worked for Levi’s Jeans for YEARS. They even gave him a silver bracelet, which he gave to me, and is one of my most cherished jewelry [in fact, I think I only own a few pieces of jewelry overall, including my graduation ring I never wear].

    Levi’s closed shop in TX, and moved across the border to Mexico.

    Levi Strauss & Co. (Levi’s) was never primarily based in Texas, though they did have major factories and distribution centers there before shifting production. The company stopped all of its U.S. manufacturing in 2003, closing its final American factories in Texas and other states to lower labor costs and take advantage of NAFTA.

    They offered the workers jobs across the border, but I mean, c’mon. Would YOU uproot your entire family to another country for a job at Levi’s?

    So basically, he, and 1,000s of other hard working honest Americans, lost his job.

    Seems unfair, doesn’t it?

    It’s not – not if you BELIEVE in Capitalism. Capitalism doesn’t care about your uncle, feelings or teams. It ONLY cares about the bottom line. That’s why it’s called ‘the bottom line.’ During the Great Depression a senator asked the CEO of a food manufacture,

    ‘You can make food cheaper to keep kids from starving’

    CEO response, ‘We’re in the business of making money – not feeding kids.’

    THAT is Capitalism, and if Indiana profits the McCaskeys and their board more, they’ll take it even if they must build the stadium over a toxic wasteland which makes your $20 beer glow green sans dye.

    You and your 50+ years of fandom, suffering, loyalty or civic pride can go fuck itself.

  • Rams, not Bears, get their Reggie White

    Rams, not Bears, get their Reggie White

    In case you live in a 50’s silo, Rams are going all-in for reigning defensive player of year Myles Garrett. Myles Garrett is coming off a historic season in which he broke the single season sack record. I normally discount a lot of these records which take extra games to achieve. OJ, not Dickerson, AP or Barry, may have my vote for best RB season of all time based on this logic.

    But context matters, and we gotta remember, Garrett broke that record [23] on the Browns [mic tap]. THE BROWNS. Not very many games they were playing with a two TD lead to force the opponents to go Air-Raid. I also vividly recall Favre folding into a fetal position for his buddy Strahan to break that record previously, so it’s not as if HIS record was clean either, and Strahan crying about it is epically ironic. Garret also hit the QB 39 times along with notching 33 TTFLs. Incredible.

    More details will emerge, I’m certain, but as of right now, this is the compensation:

    Adam Schefter@AdamSchefter
    ·1h🚨🚨🚨

    Bombshell: The Browns are finalizing a trade that will send two-time Defensive Player of the Year Myles Garrett to the Los Angeles Rams, per
    @rapsheet,@TomPelissero and me.

    In exchange for Garrett, the Rams are expected to send Pro-Bowl edge Jared Verse, a 2027 first-round pick and other draft-pick compensation still being negotiated to the Browns.

    🏈Rams receive: Myles Garrett

    🏈Browns receive: Jared Verse, a 2027 first-round pick, a 2028 2nd and a 2029 3rd.

    In other words, Rams are going all-in.
    I was going to write a big article on whether the Bears should make a move on Garrett. The idea centered around ONE question:

    Are Bears ready for a true SB push?

    Follow up question – trading for Garrett the same as trading for Mack?

    Which begs a bigger question. How much better are BJ/Caleb than Nagy/Trub?

    Trading multiple 1sts and premium players for a legit SB shot, better?

    Or are we, like with Nagy/Trub, falling into the same wishful fallacy that landed Mack but wrecked the team long-term once the Nagy/Trub gambit fizzled out?

    Well, all that is moot now as the Rams are signing their Reggie White.

    A team the Bears will no doubt have to face in the playoffs the next two years or so, which coincidently mirrors the Caleb rook contract ‘window.’

    Lots to consider here, but I’ll keep it short.

    I don’t know if the Bears COULD’ve competed against the Rams for Myles.

    While BJ/Caleb are promising, if you’re a 30 yr old Myles, you want proven not promising, and McVay/Stafford are proven. They also eliminated Bears from last playoffs. The L.A./Hollywood angle, esp contrasted against Factory of Sadness, is also a real factor.

    In addition, the Bears didn’t really roster a Verse lvl defender to throw into the mix [thxs Poles!]. I guess you can dangle Sweat, but then the Browns likely ask for more draft capital, and at this point, it seems like treading water.

    Maybe they could’ve offered Rome and Gordon. That’s likely the route I’d go if I’m Bears’ GM. I don’t really believe in Rome. Burden and Loveland are the two top receiving options IMO; plus, we still have Kmet, a new TE, and a gadget KR/WR/Slot.

    Gordon is a walking hamstring. Trade him before it’s too late.

    OTOH, maybe the Bears really didn’t have a shot. Maybe Garrett told CLE, “It’s L.A. or bust, baby.” and that was that.

    So where does this leave the Bears?

    Proper fucked.

    The Bears are in a Cold War against the Evil Empire – The Packers – who traded for Micah Parsons.

    NOW, they’re in an arms’ race vs Rams who just acquired a cobalt bomb.

    Not sure Bears could afford to keep sitting on their hands and realistically hope that somehow a motivated Dayo, old Jarrett and raw Booker>ONE Myles Garrett.

    This trade might force Poles to more aggressively target, say, DT Jeffery Simmons. More likely outcome though – Poles signs an old ass Cam Jordan or Bosa.

    That, or BJ/Caleb must go scorched earth 2000 Rams’ style.

  • Wrigley Slewing Chum

    Wrigley Slewing Chum

    It’s slow as molasses, and the one thing I whole-heartedly agreed with Jeff on was not posting filler material Sports Mockery style. Luckily for y’all, I’m not much a haikuer!

    I keep my ears more perked for Chicago-centric stories, and here’s an interesting [2 yr old] vlog on how unique Wrigley Field is, and what it can mean for both the White Sox and Da Bears.

    Because Wrigley is now designated as a Historical Land Mark, it’s nigh impossible to modify which creates a nightmare for waste. ONE Cub game produces 315 TONS of waste. Holy, and unholy, crap!

    What I didn’t know. Comiskey Park was originally built over a garbage dump in 1909. Talk about an apt metaphor [Zing!] So maybe Indiana land-fill fits the Chicago Stadium tradition, after all.

    Still, that’s better than what the Dodgers did when they kicked out all the Mexican women and children from Chavez Ravine and built over graves.

    Forcible Evictions: The final holdout families—some of whom refused to sell their properties—were forcefully evicted by the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department on May 9, 1959, an event known locally as “Black Friday”

    Maybe ICE agents should sport Dodger hats when out raiding.

    Though I suppose it can always be worse. ‘Merica!

    Clemson Memorial Stadium (Clemson, SC): For years, thousands of tailgating football fans parked over approximately 500 unmarked graves. The site is the final resting place for enslaved men and women who built the original university plantation, as well as early Black sharecroppers.

    Makes worrying about ‘light pollution’, parking, seating, domes and traffic seem like Gen Alpha issues.

    Shot out to the vlogger for a Ship of Theseus Paradox reference. Speaking of Stadium, apparently the Bears haven’t even done a traffic study for Arlington. My other stat prof [I had like 4 of them since I kept flunking] used to actually do traffic studies. Think he said the goal was just to keep drivers making lefts [insert “National European Vacation” Paris scene here].

    Happy Friday!

  • ’26 Bears’ Schedule

    ’26 Bears’ Schedule

    1st off, special shout out to my motherfucking Quant, GP!

    He put in the leg work, and remarkably, even had to hold back on showing us mouthbreathers more math, but his TLDR conclusion?

    Refs aren’t really screwing the Bears.

    Still, despite all the empirical evidence, numbers and data proving thus, still feels wrong.

    At this point if God himself descended to Soldier Field to declare the Bears are getting treated fairly, I still wouldn’t believe it!

    So for those who want to check out the pieces, just click on the 3 previous blogs.

    Onward, and upward to schedules.

    NFL is desperately attempting to make itself relevant year-round. First by extending the season from 11 games, to 12, 14, 16, 17, and soon to be, 18.

    Then they increased the playoff teams, adding a WC [which many traditional fans argued ‘watered-down’ the playoffs].

    SB may eventually land on Valentines’ Day, which I’m sure will go over well with the ladies.

    Then the NFL slowly but steadily built up the combine/Draft. Spearheaded by LegoHead Mel Kiper; it’s now an entire cottage industry. We got countless YTubers breaking down tape, mocking, grading, applying nerd-ball metrics, even supplying ProFootball Weekly style draft guides [PDF version, naturally].

    But alas, the draft ends, and casual fans once more disappear unless they’re really fiending for more draft in the form of class grades or worse – ’27 mocks!

    So, the NFL is trying to manufacture a new niche industry to sucker in more fans with Hollywood style ‘schedule releases’, and yes, ppl are actually now GRADING the productions! It won’t be long until YTubers are making their OWN schedule release vids. Book it.

    Schedules have also become much more complicated than they used to be. Before, it was just Strength of Opponent = [SOS]. But as Harry at ChatSports illustrates, ppl are now factoring ‘net rest advantage’ Apparently the Bears are at +15 while the Chargers are -24 rest days, whatever that means.

    Other nerdball metrics? Air-miles and playing teams coming off a bye + Prime Time games [now put them altogether and GP that shit].

    It should be noted that the schedule is not totally irrelevant. Last season the Pats played one of the easiest schedules of ALL TIME, and they basically skated into the playoffs before getting absolutely curb stomped by a real team in the SB.

    How much does it matter though? Well, that’s what Vegas is for, but the NFL changes weekly, even daily. Micah Parsons going on IR for the first 4 weeks is going to move the line. If Bo Nix’s ankle is proper-fucked, that changes odds dramatically. A backup QB starting will almost automatically make them dogs [unless they’re playing the Bears].

    Here’s Chris Simms on Vegas and DIV odds

    What’s interesting is how conservatively Vegas pushes. They’re still favoring the usual suspects as last season, including the Lions; in fact the only change is Rams over 9ers.

    ThienemanSZN@ThienemanSZN
    ·May 14
    The Bears open as favorites in 12/17 games

    (-2.5) Bears @ Panthers
    (-3.5) Bears vs Vikings
    (-1.5) Bears vs Eagles
    (-8.5) Bears vs Jets
    (+3.0) Bears @ Packers
    (-3.0) Bears @ Falcons
    (-1.5) Bears vs Patiots
    (+4.5) Bears @ Seahawks
    (-3.5) Bears vs Buccaneers
    (-6.5) Bears vs Saints
    (+2.5) Bears @ Lions
    (-2.5) Bears vs Jaguars
    (-5.5) Bears @ Dolphins
    (+3.5) Bears @ Bills
    (-1.5) Bears vs Packers
    (-1.5) Bears vs Lions
    (+1.5) Bears @ Vikings

    Yet they’re also favoring the Bears to win 12 out of 17. Ergo, Lions are winning 13+ games while sweeping the Bears despite still missing Ben Johnson and Aaron Glenn?

    Who’s QBing the Vikings? “Seven” or Kyler Murray? How gimpy is Parson’s back? Other teams in the NFCN still have major questions relative to Bears. Naturally, Bears also present their own major question [Dline], but a fan can’t help but be optimistic about the core –

    BJ, Allen, and Caleb.

    We’re trusting somehow they’ll get ‘er done, net rest or not – catchy promo or not. Odds be damned. All in!


  • GP: the 3rd Dimension is Terror

    GP: the 3rd Dimension is Terror

    You will want to read Pt. 1 and 2 before reading this article. 

    Aggregating the data from sources is a big PITA and so something has to go, and that is me summarizing too much. What I will say is that Pt. 1 looks at the high level deficit and see how many standard deviations we were off from other teams. Pt. 2 is looking at crews and seeing if all crews or some crews contributed to the Bears being bad. 

    Last article, I mentioned that Ben Johnson talked last camp (his 1st camp) about the culture and all the talk was how he was gonna be the Caleb whisperer, and for the most part, Caleb became a better QB under BJ. But that the teams’s OL woes kepts at him, and how he didn’t implement his full suite of tricks, formations and isolated mismatches. And that the Bears were, again, the lowest team in the league at getting flags thrown on their opponents. What we found was contra-examples of ref crews who seemed to be pro-Bears, but many krews called few penalties against Bears oppo. 

    My speculation is that for many years, Nagy and then Floose – Jussie back there – it was amazing to watch them even FIELD an offense. When a hobbled Darnell Mooney is your deep threat, and your OL has Jussie running for his life exactly 2 seconds after each snap, yeah, you ain’t getting a lot of DPI. You need a pocket to begin with to get roughing the passer. 

    I also stated that, organization wide, the Bears were a historically inept organization. Kevin Byard, on the Thanksgiving day meltdown, threw a water bottle at Floose’s head when he tried to address the team after the game. A bad analyst would state that Floose lost the team that day. A good analyst would state that Floose never had the team to begin with. Nobody bought in on that guy. Did you see Hard Knocks? Caleb is openly rolling his eyes having to listen to that guy, that Poles asked the HBO crew for shots of Floose looking thoughtfully at playbooks. As if. 

    So, to really bury this thing, we need some things. Bears against per game / crew non-Bears baseline:  1.00x
    Bears benefit per game / crew non-Bears baseline:  0.79x

    The Bears get penalized at exactly the league-average rate by these same crews. They draw 21% fewer flags on their opponents than those same crews call on other teams’ opponents. The “flag-prone Bears” hypothesis is dead. The deficit lives entirely on the benefit side.

    Per-crew breakdown — sorted by Ben/Base ratio (lowest = most asymmetric against Bears):

    Crew             BG  Crew_G  Baseline  Agst/g  Ben/g  Agst/x  Ben/x
    Scott Novak       5     66    46.06     56.40  21.00   1.22    0.46
    Ron Torbert       4     69    51.30     54.50  23.75   1.06    0.46
    Brad Rogers       6     65    53.36     46.17  29.17   0.87    0.55
    John Hussey       4     67    46.87     55.25  27.50   1.18    0.59
    Tra Blake         3     48    50.14     45.67  30.00   0.91    0.60
    Alex Kemp         2     69    51.28     90.50  32.00   1.76    0.62
    Shawn Hochuli     2     68    52.95     32.00  37.50   0.60    0.71
    Alex Moore        2     16    64.86     61.50  47.50   0.95    0.73
    Carl Cheffers     6     68    49.61     41.50  38.33   0.84    0.77
    Clete Blakeman    5     68    50.88     49.80  40.80   0.98    0.80
    Bill Vinovich     2     69    44.81     39.00  39.50   0.87    0.88
    Adrian Hill       7     65    52.91     37.29  48.71   0.70    0.92
    Clay Martin       5     68    48.10     60.00  45.80   1.25    0.95
    Shawn Smith       2     68    47.34     67.00  47.50   1.42    1.00
    Brad Allen        5     66    43.83     22.60  45.00   0.52    1.03
    Land Clark        4     66    46.73     55.25  49.50   1.18    1.06
    Alan Eck          3     48    45.01     79.00  48.00   1.76    1.07
    Craig Wrolstad    3     69    47.61     42.67  56.67   0.90    1.19

    Sign tests on the new metrics
    Bears Agst > crew baseline:  8 of 18 crews (p = 0.76)  ← right at chance
    Bears Ben < crew baseline:  13 of 18 crews (p = 0.048) ← directional

    This is the real finding. 

    What the test was supposed to distinguish:

    • Flag-prone Bears → Agst > 1, Ben ≈ 1 (both teams take normal flags from these crews; Bears just commit more)
    • Anti-Bears bias → Agst > 1 AND Ben < 1 (asymmetric on both sides)
    • Bears get fewer opponent flags specifically → Agst ≈ 1, Ben < 1 (asymmetric only on the benefit side)

    The data shows the third pattern, decisively. The Bears commit penalties at the same rate every other team does under these crews. The deficit is entirely about opponents not getting flagged when playing them. That kills the lazy “Bears just take a lot of flags” story — it’s empirically wrong.

    Crews where the asymmetry is strongest (sample size matters):

    • Scott Novak (5 games): 0.46x benefit. His non-Bears games average 46 yds against per team; his Bears games give Chicago 21 yds of opponent calls per game.
    • Brad Rogers (6 games): 0.55x benefit. Calls fewer opponent penalties on Bears’ opponents than on others’ opponents.
    • John Hussey (4 games): 0.59x benefit, 1.18x against — the only crew showing the textbook two-sided pattern at meaningful sample size.
    • Adrian Hill (7 games): 0.92x benefit but only 0.70x against — actually treats Bears slightly favorably on the benefit side, and unusually leniently on the penalty side.
    • Brad Allen (5 games, retired after ’23): 1.03x benefit, 0.52x against — he was actively the most pro-Bears crew in the league before he left.

    What this means for the bias hypothesis. 

    With the flag-prone-team alternative now empirically dead, the surviving non-bias explanations are scheme/personnel:

    1. Bears defense doesn’t induce opponent penalties — Bears don’t pressure QBs in ways that trigger holding/false-start rates from opposing OLs. Possible – if you have a quiet front seven. Did the Bears have a poor front seven these years? Ask Waffle.
    2. Bears offense doesn’t draw DPI — fewer deep shots or contested catches, so opposing DBs aren’t put in flag-drawing situations. Plausible for Fields/Bagent/Caleb-rookie eras; harder to credit for Ben Johnson’s 2025 attack.
    3. Bears don’t play teams that commit a lot of penalties — schedule effect. Plausible but the NFC North includes Minnesota, the most-flagged opponent in the league. So let’s toss that one. 

    Can you give a bitch a break?

    Sure. The 0.79x aggregate is striking enough that some combination of those factors has to be doing real work, OR there’s a genuine officiating tilt. Updated Bayesian: with prior 5%, P(asymmetric pattern | bias) ≈ 0.6, P(asymmetric pattern | scheme effects) ≈ 0.20:

    Posterior = (0.6 × 0.05) / (0.6 × 0.05 + 0.20 × 0.95)
              = 0.03 / 0.22 = 0.136

    You have names now, you can hold onto  “the Bears specifically don’t draw flags on their opponents when these particular crews are calling the game,” and that’s a much more salty question. But what you cannot do is show it’s anything more than those crews having a bias towards their back judges, and looking for DPI. We know that the NFL keeps changing what it wants with regards to DPI and how each crew is choosing to implement that across all games is probably the story. Not that the Bears get fucked. 

    Did we sink the Orca? Fuck no. What would the NFL be without third rate journos chumming the water for cheap engagement? Making wild claims that analysis does not support?

    Roughly 14% on bias — modest update, because scheme effects remain a credible explanation for opponents-only deficits. And that’s where I fall. I fall on the team having a shit OL, an anemic DL; the swing is not across all crews. A WIDE variation exists, but when you put in the fix, maybe Goodell only bribes a few crews. If you want to hang on to the anti-Bears argument with your fingernails, you have enough data to die on that hill. But I don’t think so. 

    The next test, which I am not doing because now this is getting to be real work, would be against-side breakdowns by penalty type. If Bears’ deficit in opponent DPI calls specifically tracks with their offensive air-yards profile, scheme wins. If it doesn’t track — if Bears get short-changed on garden-variety opponent holding and false starts that aren’t scheme-dependent — then bias gets harder to explain away. I am pretty certain that were I to dig further into that hole, I would not find that. 

    Well, analysis done. Nothing stands out, esp. when you compare the crews to how they behave across the league. There is no there there. Would it be fun if there was? Maybe. 

    But I prefer the narrative that George is just a massive bonehead and good coaches just didn’t want to come here until Poles realized he was on his way out unless he convinced them to open the checkbook for a Ben Johnson. Which he did. He used Warren to tie to the move. It was savvy politics. Bears need to be a playoff team to help the case w. the Illinois legislature. Being an inept doormat had run it’s course. If they were competent they would have hired real head coaches instead of Trestman and Nagy. And now Ben Johnson is working towards a team that CAN draw DPI and false starts. Well, more on the DPI, not investing anything in the front seven is going to do nothing for drawing false starts. 

    Conclusion: 

    I made my arguments, showed that there is a statistical residual effect that crap journos can point to, but there are many other contradictory truths here that are more suggestive of a deeper problem that NFL officating has, which is that krews are not consistently applying standards to DPI. Is this news, really? Because any true football fan has known this for years. Let me wrap up the findings then, with the risk-reward ratio. If that does not dispel the story then nothing will and you may want to join Irish at breaking into Area 51 because conspiracy is just your groove dude, get a Q-Anon tshirt. 

    Here is what you have to believe to think this is a real directive: The NFL risk – if any of these krews,made up of SEVEN men plus a dedicated reply official tied to that crew in New York – if any of those guys get a hankering to talk to the Guardian or Intercept about this, you blow the league up. Goodell better have a Deadpool class assassin at the ready since fucking a major market like Chicago will gain you all kinds of 2nd rate journalists picking up the story once the first-rate ones open that gate. 

    The reward: One flag per game. Either holding on the oppo OL or OPI on their wideouts. You have to imagine a conversation that singles out 10 of 15 crews, because the NFL psych profile won’t risk it on the other five, and you say to them “don’t call MORE penalties on the Bears, just DON’T call one penalty on their opponents that you otherwise would have. Don’t go more than one, or the stats will start to look too bad, just one flag and then go back to being a fair ref. Maybe you just need the line judge or the back judge and not the whole crew. You have heard of point shaving, this is penalty shaving. 

    What does that buy you in terms of W-L? A single flag? Almost nothing. It’s so improbable to change a game the math isn’t worth showing. So, you risk the state of the whole league to just, perhaps, do a 2nd order point shave? Wouldn’t it be easier to just Art Schliester that shit and get to a QB who needs money? Or a RB? Just about any player is a better risk than a ref, who isn’t paid that well, may be a lawyer himself in real life, and is likely to be much more savvy about leaking the story? Or can we just say that the Bears didn’t draw holding because the DL was not that good at getting sacks? Or the Bears OL didn’t get DPI because for alot of that time their QB was basically another running back? We live in insane times where all manner of insane conspiracies get chummed. It’s sad that it’s coming from people who hold themselves out as experts, because their “expertise” is shit. 

  • GP 2. Electric Boogaloo

    GP 2. Electric Boogaloo

    Pt. 2

    Last article we looked at Warren Sharp and Kristin Tanis assertion that, according to Tanis, the NFL is going out of it’s way to fuck the Bears over. They assertively postulated that the what exists, with no discussion on a possible why. They hate the McCaskeys? They are angry about the team not going to the Ryan family? Nobody is talking about what would be a massive scandal for the NFL, that they conspired to shit on a major market and a very popular team and keep them down. 

    So, what’s going on? Because the net effect of this chum in the water is that it exonerates the McCaskey family for years of utter incompetence as owners. In the week that followed Floose’s Thanksgiving Day meltdown, people like Colin Cowerd let the veil slip and said what Chicagoans have known for years – Ditka was right. The McCaskeys suck. They hired shit coaches, shit staff. Jeff spent years talking about what a viper pit that Halas Hall was. Because it was all true. 

    Saying the NFL hates the Bears feels very propaganda, it feels like a few low life journos on the interwebz just throw that into the water and give Ginny and her boys a great big pass. So that’s my take. But, in order to really push this nonsense off, we are going to go down the Neil DeGrasse Tyson MasterClass path and teach a bit about critical thinking. And that’s to say, give what you may think is bullshit a full shrift. 

    Last article I calculated the SD, Mean, z-score, p-score and looked at the bias, and found what I thought may be reasonable explanations why the Bears opponents don’t get as many penalties as other teams. Why they are always last in opponent yards flagged. Is the fix in? The refs are told, “yeah dude, if a team is playing the Bears, let them get away with some shit. Let them hold, don’t flag them for false starts, just let them go so that the Bears get fucked.” And we found that over the life of the thing, the Bears are down about a single flag, a 10 yard penalty. Had one more flag been called per game across 4 seasons, this would not be a conversation. But that’s enough to look at it, and the data there – at the aggregate level, says wow – Bears suck at drawing penalties, but to really really know if this is a thing the refs are told to do, it helps to know if it was all the krews or just some. And that takes work from nflpenalties.com.

    So, to rise to the metaphor, we have spears in our back and two yellow barrels pulling us up, but we have no choice – if we are gonna kill the crew of the Orca we gotta submerge, we gotta go deep. 

    Bears 2025 game-level data with crews:

    Wk   Opp       Crew               Agst  Benef   Net
    W1   vs MIN    Alan Eck            127     50   -77
    W2   @ DET     Land Clark           50     28   -22
    W3   vs DAL    Clay Martin          41     25   -16
    W4   @ LV      Adrian Hill          60     36   -24
    W6   @ WAS     Alex Moore           84     40   -44
    W7   vs NO     Scott Novak          92     30   -62
    W8   @ BAL     Shawn Smith          79     45   -34
    W9   @ CIN     Clete Blakeman       43     49    +6
    W10  vs NYG    Adrian Hill          25     69   +44
    W11  @ MIN     Brad Rogers          40     15   -25
    W12  vs PIT    John Hussey          83     41   -42
    W13  @ PHI     Carl Cheffers        35     44    +9
    W14  @ GB      Craig Wrolstad       17     55   +38
    W15  vs CLE    Ron Torbert          25     21    -4
    W16  vs GB     Alex Kemp           105     40   -65
    W17  @ SF      Alex Moore           39     55   +16
    W18  vs DET    Brad Rogers          25     35   +10
    WC   vs GB     Adrian Hill           5     65   +60
    Div  vs LAR    Shawn Hochuli        24      5   -19
                                       999    748  -251

    Aggregated to 15 distinct crews:
    Crew              G    Net   Net/g
    Alan Eck          1   -77   -77.0
    Alex Kemp         1   -65   -65.0
    Scott Novak       1   -62   -62.0
    John Hussey       1   -42   -42.0
    Shawn Smith       1   -34   -34.0
    Land Clark        1   -22   -22.0
    Shawn Hochuli     1   -19   -19.0
    Clay Martin       1   -16   -16.0
    Alex Moore        2   -28   -14.0
    Brad Rogers       2   -15    -7.5
    Ron Torbert       1    -4    -4.0
    Clete Blakeman    1    +6    +6.0
    Carl Cheffers     1    +9    +9.0
    Craig Wrolstad    1   +38   +38.0
    Adrian Hill       3   +80   +26.7

    What the breakdown actually tells you:

    The Bears were net negative under 11 of 15 crews. Sign test under H0 of 50/50 per crew: one-sided p = 0.059. Game-level (12 of 19 negative): p = 0.18. Borderline at the crew level, not significant at the game level.

    The pattern is spread across crews rather than concentrated, which is the bias-consistent shape — but with the obvious problem that 12 of the 15 crews only worked a single Bears game, so each “data point” is one game’s noise. You cannot distinguish “Alan Eck has it in for Chicago” from “Week 1 was just a flag-fest” with n=1.

    The most interesting signal cuts the other direction: Adrian Hill worked three Bears games (W4, W10, Wild Card vs GB) and his crew was hugely positive for Chicago — net +80 yards, averaging +27/game. If the league were systematically tilted against Chicago, you’d expect no crew to swing that positive over three games. That single data point is enough to make a “uniform anti-Bears bias” hypothesis hard to defend; it shifts the explanation toward “specific crews have specific tendencies that happened to disfavor Chicago in 2025.” Which is a much weaker claim and frankly an unfalsifiable one without crew-level data across many seasons. We must leave the n=1 noise floor, like Jaws must jam his nose into the wooden planks of the Orca despite the pain. We have found a crew in 2025 that cut Bears-positive. Maybe he didn’t get the memo. Maybe he’s secretly born in Joliet. 

    Does not matter. If Adrian Hill stays positive for the Bears across all four seasons and Alan Eck stays negative, you’ve got something real and specific. If everyone regresses to the mean across years, the 2025 spread was just variance and the cumulative Bears deficit needs a different explanation.

    Cumulative crew-level net (Beneficiary minus Against), Bears 2022–2025:
    Crew              G    Agst   Benef    Net   Net/g    Years
    Alex Kemp         2     181      64   -117   -58.5    23,25
    Scott Novak       5     282     105   -177   -35.4    22-25
    Alan Eck          3     237     144    -93   -31.0    23-25
    Ron Torbert       4     218      95   -123   -30.8    22-25
    John Hussey       4     221     110   -111   -27.8    22-25
    Shawn Smith       2     134      95    -39   -19.5    24,25
    Brad Rogers       6     277     175   -102   -17.0    22-25
    Tra Blake         3     137      90    -47   -15.7    22-24
    Clay Martin       5     300     229    -71   -14.2    22-25
    Alex Moore        2     123      95    -28   -14.0    25
    Clete Blakeman    5     249     204    -45    -9.0    22-25
    Land Clark        4     221     198    -23    -5.8    22,24,25
    Carl Cheffers     6     249     230    -19    -3.2    22-25
    Bill Vinovich     2      78      79     +1    +0.5    23,24
    Shawn Hochuli     2      64      75    +11    +5.5    22,25
    Adrian Hill       7     261     341    +80   +11.4    22-25
    Craig Wrolstad    3     128     170    +42   +14.0    22,23,25
    Brad Allen        5     113     225   +112   +22.4    22-24


    Sign Tests:

    Crew level:  13 of 18 crews negative, 5 positive   → one-sided p = 0.048
    Game level:  45 of 70 games negative, 24 positive  → one-sided p = 0.0077
    Year-over-year persistence (the more diagnostic question):

    Crew              2022      2023      2024      2025
    John Hussey       -5.0(1)   -27.0(1)  -37.0(1)  -42.0(1)   ← all 4 negative, getting worse
    Brad Rogers       -4.5(2)   -38.0(1)  -40.0(1)  -7.5(2)    ← all 4 negative
    Scott Novak       -43.0(1)  -37.0(2)  +2.0(1)   -62.0(1)   ← 3 of 4 negative
    Ron Torbert       -54.0(1)  -66.0(1)  +1.0(1)   -4.0(1)    ← 3 of 4 negative
    Carl Cheffers     +23.5(2)  -28.5(2)  -18.0(1)  +9.0(1)    ← mixed
    Brad Allen        +8.0(2)   +31.5(2)  +33.0(1)    –        ← all 3 positive (retired ’24)
    Adrian Hill       -6.5(2)   -40.0(1)  +53.0(1)  +26.7(3)   ← flipped from neg to strong pos
    Craig Wrolstad    -25.0(1)  +29.0(1)    –       +38.0(1)   ← mostly positive

    What this actually shows.

    The crew-level sign test is borderline (p = 0.048). Game level is solidly significant (p = 0.008). Both consistent with the cumulative finding — the Bears are net-flagged-against across most of the league’s officiating, not just by a few crews.

    But the per-crew sample sizes are still ugly. Most crews worked 2–6 Bears games over four years; the standard error on a single game’s net is ~50 yards, so even Hussey’s −27.8/g across four games has a 95% CI that crosses zero. You cannot, with this dataset alone, say “Hussey calls Bears games unfairly” with statistical confidence — you can only say his four data points all happen to be negative. That’s interesting but it’s not proof. Maybe he’s just a bad ref.

    The two findings that meaningfully update the bias hypothesis, in opposite directions:

    1. Spread-out negative pattern is real. 13 of 18 crews coming out negative isn’t what you’d see from a one-or-two-bad-crews story. It looks like the Bears get net-flagged against by most of the league. That’s the bias-consistent pattern or the structurally-flag-heavy-team pattern; both predict this.
    2. Brad Allen’s three years are the killer counterargument to bias. All three of his Bears games came in clean +30s. Adrian Hill flipped from negative to strong positive over time. Wrolstad is positive. If the league were systematically tilted, you should see no crew running consistently +20 or +30 net for Chicago. The fact that you do — and that “+22.4/g” Allen exists in the same dataset as “−27.8/g” Hussey — is hard to reconcile with uniform institutional bias. It’s much more consistent with crews having different general flag-throwing tendencies, full stop, and the Bears being a flag-heavy team that gets hurt more by high-volume crews.

    Let’s stop there, just for a moment. Last camp, how many times did you read that Ben Johnson brought the full camp to a stop. Huddled everyone up. He was seeing all manner of false starts, route confusion and guys not knowing what page they were on. He admitted he scaled back his offense. Is that consistent with a culture that sucks? A culture that had a lot of skating, a lot of dodging the hard mental work needed? Seemed that way to everyone at the time, because the consistent narrative was that BJ was changing the culture and making people accountable. 

    You, dear reader, are saying “oh GP, you pretentious fuck, you all but admitted your bias, and while there is a counterpoint crew, you just gave your own game away. You showed that there is a large group of crews that don’t like the Bears. McCaskey is exonerated! Let’s salute the brave denziens of Twatter/X with their ability to call out mass fuckery!” 

    Well.. hold on there Cowboy. 

    The cleanest test still missing. 

    What I haven’t done is compare each crew’s Bears-game numbers to that crew’s non-Bears numbers. If Hussey’s crew calls 50 against / 60 for in non-Bears games but 55 against / 27.5 for in Bears games, that’s anti-Bears. If Hussey’s crew calls 55 against / 28 for in every game they work, the Bears are just unlucky to draw the same crew four times. That’s the next layer of analysis, and it’s the one that would actually distinguish “Bears get unfairly flagged” from “Bears get a lot of flags and a few referee crews call a lot of flags.

    That is for article three. Now… go get your shine box

  • Mathing Bears Getting Screwed

    Mathing Bears Getting Screwed

    Let’s begin this story where many stories start; somebody posted some shit on Twitter. Specifically, Warren Sharp stirred it up with this: 

    Now, if you chum the waters from the back of the Orca, sometimes you’re gonna need a bigger boat. Sometimes sharks appear. So let’s be a Great White, shall we, and take a big bite out of this. Because it started to get legs with this Tanis lady picking that ball up and running with it. 

    Tanis goes on to say, “Either the Bears have the worst luck in the history of history, or the NFL is going out of their way to screw over the bears (which seems most likely seeing how they were not awarded the comp picks when Cunningham was hired by ATL). Every team thinks the refs are screwing their team over. However there are stats that show it’s actually happening to the Bears. On a yearly basis. And you can’t say it’s coaching/play calling, bc there have been two (technically three) different head coaches for the bears in the last 4 years. “

    Can you leave that alone? I decided not to. Bears Tax. It’s all that the regs on DBB and DBB2 ever talked about for years, how the NFL hates Chicago and how the Packers get their ring rimmed constantly, esp. in the 4th Q when the fix is sent in on carrier pigeon by Goodell himself. I mean, seriously, fuck that guy. FTP. All of it. 

    So, let’s preface first. There was a DBB reg named Data. Or that’s what we called him. Nice guy, Jeff at DBB used to let him guest post. He used to post “statistics” as conversation starters, and that was all well and good. His idea of statistics was to open up Excel and make a pivot table, and punch some information in, then draw a conclusion from said information, and the debate was on the way. Nice guy. It had no bearing on actual stats, but it was pat on the head nice. I offered to help him with actual statistical analysis, but he shooed me away (politely) and said that he was quite happy in his life doing his tables and drawing his conclusions, and not to mess with his Wizard of Oz magical ways. So, I did not. 

    But a Bears tax won’t be served by a pivot table. We need stats from Yahoo and we need to tranquilize this Lion and open it’s mouth and check it’s teeth. So, in case you were wondering, we shall now engage in ACTUAL STATISTICS.

    Our postulation: the NFL or given crews have it out for the Chicago Bears. That a Bears Tax exists, or are these just journalists who are bad at stats doing what the Twatter was made for: stirring the pot. Getting a big wooden spoon and swirling the shit until the scent attracts real sharks. Let’s take a bite of that swordfish on the line being towed. As Khan himself said, Sharp tasks me! He tasks me, and I shall have him!

    Step 1- Summary Stat

    Bears total beneficiary yards (2022-25)

    = 652 + 530 + 794 + 748 = 2,724
    Bears total games = 17 + 17 + 17 + 19 = 70
    Bears yds/game (x_CHI)= 2,724 / 70 = 38.9143

    Step 2 – We need a cross-team reference distribution, For each of the 32 teams I computed cumulative yds/game (total beneficiary yds ÷ total games over the four seasons). What do we see?

    Unweighted mean   x̄ = (1/n) Σ x_i = 1557.0305 / 32  = 48.6572
    Weighted mean     μ_w = ΣY / ΣG = 110,739 / 2,278 = 48.6124
    SS deviations     Σ(x_i – x̄)² = 481.9894
    Sample variance   s² = SS / (n-1)  = 481.9894 / 31 = 15.5480
    Sample SD         s  = √15.5480 = 3.9431

    The two means differ by 0.04 because teams have different game counts (playoff teams play more). 
    Use the unweighted x̄ as the location parameter for the cross-team distribution since the SD is also computed across teams.

    Step 3 – Z-Score

    z = (x_CHI – x̄) / s = (38.9143 – 48.6572) / 3.9431 = -2.4709
    Step 4 – P-values

    Bears weren’t pre-specified. We’re picking them because they’re the outlier. Correcting for 32 teams (i.e., asking “what’s P[some team this extreme]”):

    P(any team z ≤ -2.47) = 1 – (1 – 0.006739)^32     = 0.1946    ≈ 1 in 5
    Bonferroni upper bound = 32 × 0.006739            = 0.2157


    Step 5 – Cumulative deficit interpretation.

    Expected Bears yds at league rate
    = 70 × 48.6124  = 3,402.87
    Actual Bears yds = 2,724
    Deficit = 678.87 yds over 4 seasons
                                          = ~170 yds/season
                                          = ~10 yds/game

    Step 6 – What is this test rejecting?

    The cross-team SD of 3.94 includes both sampling noise and legitimate between-team variation (scheme, pace, QB style). So z = -2.47 against this SD says: “the Bears are far below where teams typically end up, including the noise of 70 games and the spread of 32 different football operations.” Rejecting at p = 0.007 means rejecting “all 32 teams have identical underlying penalty-drawing rates” — a null that was already false on inspection (Minnesota at 57.7, Bears at 38.9, both with 70 games). 

    It does not mean rejecting “no anti-Chicago referee bias.” So we must continue forward.

    A more aggressive test using only sampling variance (treating per-game yds as iid within each team and ignoring between-team scheme effects) would give a smaller p, but the inferential gap to “bias” gets wider, not narrower, because more of the variance gets attributed to legitimate team differences.

    Now we need a Bayesian wrapper on this: P(bias | data) = P(data | bias) × P(bias) / P(data)
                  = P(data | bias) × P(bias) / [P(data|bias)P(bias) + P(data|¬bias)P(¬bias)]

    If your prior P(systematic anti-Chicago bias) is 5%, and you generously assume P(z ≤ -2.47 | bias) = 0.50 vs. P(z ≤ -2.47 | no bias) = 0.195 (the look-elsewhere baseline — under “no bias” we still expect some team to be the outlier ~1 year in 5):
    Posterior = (0.50 × 0.05) / (0.50 × 0.05 + 0.195 × 0.95)
              = 0.025 / 0.21025
              = 0.119

    So the data moves the bias hypothesis from a 5% prior to ~12% posterior. Real movement, but nothing close to “proven.” 

    The data is moderately suggestive, not damning, and the dominant alternative explanation — that the Bears have run an anemic offense for most of this window and bad offenses don’t draw flags — costs nothing extra in plausibility.

    Oh GP, you fucker, you say, sure… Jussie was a shitbird and could not run an offense. Eberflus was so ill-regarded that other teams could see into their setups and adjust. Floose running the Cowboys D in such an inept manner showed his scheme just didn’t get breaks. But what about Caleb? What about BJ? That Tanis broad, she was on it, was she not? She points out that the Bears tax runs between regimes! Ha ha! Checkmate! Take your math and shove it you Grey Poupon eating pretentious math ass!

    Well… hold on there Cowboy. 

    2025 only: League mean 50.47 yds/g, SD 6.83, Bears 39.37. Bears z = −1.63, one-sided p = 0.052, look-elsewhere p = 0.82. So the single season isn’t statistically remarkable — the Bears were lowest, but only by 0.68 yds/g over Buffalo. What makes 2025 important isn’t the single-season significance; it’s that it removes the easiest counter-narrative.

    The asymmetry signal in 2025 is the cleaner one:

    Against/g    Benef/g    Net/g
    Bears             52.58      39.37    -13.21
    Buffalo           50.26      40.05    -10.21
    Denver          61.79      48.21    -13.58
    Detroit         42.24      41.24     -1.00
    SF                36.95      41.42     +4.47
    LA Rams       34.55      51.55    +17.00

    Yahoo has the 2025 Bears 6th in total yds/g (379.2) and 9th in PPG (25.9). I’ll grant top-10. Caleb’s 388 rushing yards is good-not-elite (Lamar’s typically 700–900) but the scramble-draws-flags mechanism is real. And the Bears threw 574 pass attempts — lots of dropbacks where DPI/holding could be called. So you’ve largely killed the “low pace / low pass volume” version of the alternative. What survives:

    1. Scheme-specific: Ben Johnson’s offense is precise and quick-throw oriented — fewer extended plays, fewer deep shots, fewer of the situations that draw DPI and defensive holding. Detroit ran a similar offense and was 3rd lowest in 2025.
    2. Sack rate: Bears took 24 sacks, well below average. Lower QB-hit volume = fewer roughing-the-passer chances. The Caleb-doesn’t-get-hit story works partly against the scramble-draws-flags story.
    3. Pure noise on a one-season sample.Sorry but that’s what it is. 

    Tanis and her 2025 evidence kills the strongest version of the boring alternative (“Bears suck offensively, of course they don’t draw flags “). It does NOT kill the scheme-and-style version, and the look-elsewhere correction still applies to the cumulative case. If I redo the Bayes with prior 5%, P(data|bias) = 0.50, and revise P(data|no bias) down from 0.195 to maybe 0.12 (since the boring alternative is partly defanged):

    Posterior = (0.50 × 0.05) / (0.50 × 0.05 + 0.12 × 0.95) = 0.180

    You’re at ~18% posterior on bias. That’s three-and-a-half times the prior, but it’s still a minority position. The data is suggestive. To push it toward damning, the test you’d want is referee-crew breakdown — if the Bears’ deficit holds across all 17 crews, that’s hard to explain without bias; if it concentrates in three of them, you’ve got something more specific and frankly more interesting than “the league hates Chicago.” So, that is the rabbit hole we must go down in a future article. As Hippy likes  to say, “where the fuck do you find this stuff?”

    Per-game data with referee crews — pulled from the team-by-game pages:

    These give every Bears game with the date, opponent, ref crew, count, yards — both for penalties against the Bears and for penalties against their opponents. 

    So, for article 1 I have tried to show that Jussie + Floose just made for bad years, and I cannot suss out a systemic bias from the data. No way some journos without a quant background can do it. Easier to chum the water than reel the shark in, isn’t it? It took a scuba tank and Quint’s old M1 Garand to finish that monster off. If you are gonna get out there in public and declare a Bears tax exists, then extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. And so we shall venture forth looking for Part 2 Hypothesis, which we shall call the Billy Butcher hypothesis, being:  “yeah, ok, but I bet some ref crews are rite cunts!”  Onward we go.

  • Owner’s Meeting

    Owner’s Meeting

    I don’t know what really goes on at the owner’s meetings. Sometimes it feels like the NFL just likes filler; however, Cronin and other beat reporters did get some nuggets.

    Courtney Cronin@CourtneyRCronin
    ·Mar 30

    Some takeaways from Ben Johnson’s 30-minute session at the NFC coaches breakfast
    -Said he found out about Drew Dalman’s decision to retire in mid-February. Team quickly pivoted to Garrett Bradbury, who they believe “will fit us like a glove”
    -Johnson on left tackle: “There’s a lot of uncertainty there.” Said he’s not sure the Bears will have Ozzy Trapilo during the 2026 season after Trapilo suffered a “pretty serious injury” with his ruptured patellar tendon.” Johnson said it’s hard to say what the Bears left tackle position will look like this year or in five years.
    -Braxton Jones is up to 310 pounds and looked “yolked” when Johnson saw him come in to sign his contract during free agency. Said Jones is eager to get his career trajectory back on track.
    -Johnson isn’t happy with the offensive staff for how they didn’t coach WRs to get open enough. Emphasized getting back to fundamentals in OTAs on catching the ball to address drop issues.

    [This makes me wonder about Rome sticking. I feel like BJ covets quick-twitch athletes like Burden and Loveland – players who can separate with short area burst. That’s not Rome. Johnson also brought up how Rome and others must do better on scramble drills. Bears were 3rd worst in drops, and 1st worst in dropped yardage.]


    -Johnson and the Bears staff recently turned on the tape from Family Fest at Soldier Field in early August 2025 (the really sloppy practice that featured a bunch of delay of game penalties) to see where they were starting camp last year and how much further ahead they want to be in OTAs with the offense.
    -New OC Press Taylor (formerly the passing game coordinator) is “the most organized coach I’ve ever been around” per Johnson. Noted his “library of plays” for how to beat different defenses and how he organizes information as a benefit to Johnson in Taylor’s new role.
    -Johnson said coaches will be “hyper vigilant” to any complacency and entitlement after the success of last season. While he was happy to hear from fans/supporters “for about a week” about how exciting the 2025 season was, he said he doesn’t want to hear anymore about how good the Bears were as they have moved on to 2026.
    -New safety Coby Bryant wowed Johnson with a ‘holy cow, it-factor’ in terms of his leadership. Will be a critical piece to replace the leadership void created by Kevin Byard’s departure.
    -Johnson noted how “challenging” it was to form relationships with Jaylon Johnson and Kyler Gordon last year given how both missed significant time with injuries. “We’re starting over completely this spring” with their relationships so he has a better chance to get to know these players.

    Don’t be shocked if Ben Johnson wants a LT at #25. Ryan Poles was front and center for the Bama proday and apparently met with Kadyn Proctor — a 6-foot-7, 352-pound offensive tackle

    Bearsszn@bearszn
    ·
    Bears GM Ryan Poles says the team will stay disciplined with their “best player available” draft philosophy even if that means drafting offense over defense:

    “You look at the draft, when I’ve been here, we’ve taken the right mentality and taken the best available. That’s been very offensive centric and I think that’s paid off for us. We got an All-Pro tackle (Darnell Wright) and Colston’s going to be All-Pro tight end. So, we’ve done some really good things there. It just hasn’t lined up to be defensive line…..I think the biggest mistake you can make is forcing something just because that’s what you need.”

    via@HogeAndJahns

  • Audentes fortuna iuvat

    Audentes fortuna iuvat

    Growing up is confusing enough, but it’s even more of a clusterfuck when you get contradictory advice. We often rely on folksy sayings, time proven proverbs and maxims especially when one doesn’t have a dad [like me]. You can probably finish these:

    “Bird in the hand…”, “Devil finds work…”, “A penny saved…”All work and no play…”

    “Measure twice cut once” – Lincoln.

    One of my faves.

    But sometimes you get conflicting proverbs:

    “He who hesitates loses.”
    “Look before you leap.”

    OK. So which is it? Well, both are in/correct aren’t they? Plenty of evidence for either cases. One learns in life that, unlike football, no playbook exists, so you gotta decide, often in a split second, which to roll with.

    Aristotle said as much. “You can’t make someone wise.” Seems like the last case a philosopher should write, but that’s essentially what he expressed. He advocated The Golden Mean: Making the right decision involves acting at the right time, towards the right people, for the right purpose, and in the right way.

    Student, “Follow up question, Prof A… how do we discern that?”

    Aristotle, “Ultimately, that’s up to YOU.”

    In other words, “You can lead a horse to water…”

    In literature [and now films] the ‘hero’ is often presented with a choice:

    1. Stay home. Think about your family, safety and happiness. A woman usually presents this case [think Adrian in “Rocky IV” – “You can’t win!”].
    2. Take a chance. Set off! Sometimes an elderly ‘wise’ man spurs this on like Obi Wan to Luke or guides the neophyte [up to a point] like Virgil in Dante’s “Paradise Lost”.

    Call to adventure“. It’s a Jungian trope that is in nearly every movie.

    What the hell are you babbling on about, Butch? Gimme football!

    Well young grass-hoppa, this IS about football, the Bears and Poles.

    See, Poles thus far has acted prudently. He hasn’t splurged like the Raiders or leveraged the Bears’ future, but he also hasn’t been completely frigid in FA like the Puke during the Rodgers-Favre era.

    Poles has taken the middle road. When his Nissan broke down, he didn’t hit the German dealership. He took a bus to his local Carmax and purchased a newer Camry.

    Now, that could work. Maybe he’s saving his pennies for some secret target we’re not privy to. Or maybe Booker suddenly turns into Richard Dent, or Benedet’s arms grow 2 inches, or Motivated Dayo Mack-Attacks the league…I suppose anything’s possible. It certainly appears Poles is banking on prior bets to finally pay.

    This all leaves us sorta…meh, right?

    Maybe lit and flicks have conditioned us so thoroughly that we no longer can sit on our hands; spectators get fidgety . We WANT Achilles to go to Troy. We WANT Rocky to fight Drago. We WANT Luke to fly to the stars.

    We WANT a Crosby, Garrett, or Hendrickson.

    Now, going bold doesn’t always work out. If “Grinder” represents the extreme of caution, “Worm” represents the other spectrum of recklessness.

    Jerry “Glitchy” Angelo went bold and signed Cutler.

    Ryan Pace went bold and gave up the kitchen sink for Mack.

    We all remember the Herschel Walker Trade and the Ditka-Ricky Williams marriage. Heck, The Commandos’ MO basically the last 40 years has been to Albert Haynesworth it.

    Still, at SOME point, you gotta take your shot.

    A GM certainly can’t be “Worm”, but being “Grinder” is death by a thousand papercuts.

    Whether it’s literature, movies, or life, a person rarely achieves anything staying on the couch.

    “Well-behaved women seldom make history.” – Laurel Thatcher Ulrich

    Perhaps the most frustrating part for fans is that we MUST trust Poles’ to ‘decide on the right player, in the right way, at the right time.’ Like lowly peasants, we have no choice but to back whatever king is on the throne, whether he be just, dumb or mad. Still, that’s a TALL ask given Poles’ history. Patience is thinning especially for one who believes this team can truly push for a SB.

    So, remember, Poles.

    Fortune favors the bold.”