Some early camp observations. Personally, I like Clay Harbor. Former TE who, unlike Olin, doesn’t love everyone in a Bears’ uni. I find his breakdowns to the point.
So here’s his takes from last week.
They play an Allen clip talking about acquiring Cam Jordan. Not sure if it’ll happen, but needless to say I wouldn’t mind more help at Dline as Harbor addresses the obvious red flags for Dayo and Turner.
‘Dayo had one sack vs a backup before his Achilles tore [2nd time, btw] while Turner played a grand total of 74 football snaps which is approx ONE game’
Harbor further elaborates, ‘The Seahawks’ top sack leader last season only had 7 sacks [3 less than Sweat]. Eagles the season prior? 8 sacks. But what they did have was waves of rushers.’
I think it’s reasonable to count on Sweat and Booker to get those 8ish sacks; however, who are the 3rd and 4rth rushers to keep the heat up? God help Bears if either Sweat or Booker miss time.
The vid also covers why the Bears made Center practically priority #1 counting on Caleb and the O to force opposing teams into more passing downs trying to catch up.
Also mentions Xavion Thomas and Sam Rouche as standouts and how Luther Burdern, not Rome, will be WR1.
‘Burden finished extremely efficiently. Project his last 5 games and that’s 1,200 yds.
Burden’s passer rating when targeted = 110 DJ = 110 Loveland = 103 Rome = 81 [sad trombone].
Maybe it was Rome’s foot. Or maybe he’s simply not a top 10 pick.
Back to the draft grind. Coming quick! Covered quite a bit of the positions but now more the big boys on the O.
Oline is definitely hardest to grade cuz unless you’re a scout or pro, how the heck are you gonna get a hold of college tape of oline? Soon as the ball is snapped, the camera pans to QB, then RB/WR.
When I used to be more into the draft, a few sites actually compressed entire games/snaps, and a very bored unmarried, childless, Butch, would watch.
Yet I suspect NCAA/NFL cracked down on many of those sites [think this is how Your Boy Roy ended].
Olin knows what he’s talking about when it comes to Oline, but IMO, he’s OVERLY optimistic on just about everyone. Off the top of my head, I don’t really recall him criticizing any recent Bear Olinemen, and we had more than a few stinkers.
It’s just in Olin’s nature. He’s not a Greg Gabriel type willing to call his fellow grinders out. He may, but it’s very subtle, so us Bear fans are REALLY left at the mercy of the paid ‘experts’ when it comes to diagnosing.
If any regs actually watch college religiously and can diagnose all these prospects, feel free to chime in!
[Big Mike still around?]
Tier I
1. LT Monroe Freeling [Georgia]He’s not falling to the Bears. Next.
2.OG/RTMauigoa [Miami]. Unless Thuney also retires…Mauigoa can man RT, but Wright ain’t moving to LT. One stat I found interesting is that 1st rd OGs are relatively safe. About 70% ‘success’ rate while WR hit rate hovers around 40%.
3.OT Max Iheanachor [Arizona State]. “I’m not sure if he doesn’t have the potential to be the best one of all….16-32 range” – Simms. This is a prospect that has seemingly shot out of nowhere; some may even be shocked he’s graded this highly. He’s from Nigeria, mostly played basketball and soccer then transferred to the same local community college I attended when I nearly flunked out of school! East Los Angeles College [ELAC]. And yes, it’s exactly how you may imagine, so for Max to climb this far – inspiring. Lacks the polish/mechanics, but flaunts the raw body, power, and athleticism which Poles loves. As with most ‘raw’ linemen who came to football late – he’s a gamble. Remember, Kyle Long, a physical freak with NFL genetics, had to kick inside because he couldn’t handle LT/RT.
Tier II
4. OT Kadyn Proctor [Bama]. He’s def a popular mock to Bears at #25 ‘He’s not an athlete like the previous – not going to pull, sometimes stops feet, punch not great. High ceiling/low floor. Not a 1st RDer. Mid second‘ Simms. I just don’t know if he’s a system fit. Seems more equipped for one gap power. Poles specifically likes athletic LTs. Both Kiran and Braxton can move even getting to the second lvl; however, BJ/Rouschar may not mind more lumbering oafs who can, ya know, destroy the person in front of them. Trapilo isn’t exactly a dancing bear.
5. LT/OT Caleb Lomu [Utah]. ‘Opposite of Proctor. Great feet. Questionable power. Sometimes plays too tall. Lacks the anchor and the ass. Not a 1st RDer. Top 45ish’ – Simms
IOL:
TIER I
1.Emmanuel Pregnon [Oregon]. ‘Blocking for him isn’t adequate. He wants to drive you into the dirt. Square. Strong Arms. Twitchy. 10-20ish’ -Simms. Could be a sneaky Poles’ pick if he falls to 25.
TIER II
2. Keylan Rutledge [Georgia Tech]’Physical. Plays beyond the whistle. Over aggressive. Athletic enough. They run in Georgia’ -Simms [20-30 range]
3. Vega Ioane [Penn St]’20-30. Best pass pro. Incredible anchor. Feet. Run game must improved.’ – Simms
TIER III
4. Spencer Fano [Utah]. ‘Looks more like an OG than an OT. Anchor and footwork won’t cut it at OT. Arms short, but wingspan is bigger than Will Campbell. Athletic but not aggressive. End of 1st RD’ – Simms Only interest I’d have in Fano is at C where some coaches tested him.
5.C Jake Slaughter [Florida]. Mocked frequently in 4rth. Connor Lew [Auburn], Sam Hecht [Kansas St], Logan Jones[Iowa] all clumped together. ‘Slaughter not overwhelming, but doesn’t make mistakes. More of a zone blocker Mid 2nd RDer. Center is the hardest for me to evaluate.’ – Simms
If Poles/BJ is looking for more than just a band aid at C, then these bigguns absolutely in play. I see Slaughter to the Bears in tons of simulations, some Hecht as ‘sleeper,’ and TBH, I don’t have the time to watch the tape of the others!
The NFL’s Leverage: How They Can Actually Threaten McCaskeys
Relocation Vote — The Nuclear Option
Under the NFL’s relocation policy (last formalized after the Raiders/Rams/Chargers moves), a team cannot relocate without a 3/4 owner vote — 24 of 32 owners must approve. The league could simply tell the Bears: “We will whip the votes against you.” The McCaskeys know how this played out when Oakland and San Diego tried to block the Raiders and Chargers — owners are notoriously unsympathetic to teams that didn’t “exhaust local options.” The NFL could credibly argue the Bears haven’t done that, given Illinois keeps putting offers on the table.
The Relocation Fee
When the Rams, Raiders, and Chargers moved, they paid relocation fees in the range of $550M–$650M each. The NFL could signal they intend to impose a maximum fee — potentially north of a billion dollars given the Bears’ market size. Chicago is the #3 market in the country. Losing the Bears to Indiana (technically still the Chicagoland area, but still) would set a wildly destabilizing precedent. The fee alone could crater the financial math of the Hammond deal.
Stripping Marquee Events
The NFL controls Super Bowl bids, Pro Bowls, and Draft locations. A new Bears stadium is essentially being built around hosting Super Bowls and Final Fours — it’s core to Kevin Warren’s whole pitch. The league could quietly signal that a Hammond stadium, built partly as leverage against Illinois rather than through good-faith negotiation, won’t be in the Super Bowl rotation for years. That wrecks the revenue projections in the financing model.
“Chicago Bears” Name/Brand — The Soft Threat
This one is rarely discussed but has teeth: the NFL could raise the question of whether a team that moves to Hammond, Indiana can still be called the “Chicago Bears.” Technically the NFL controls the franchise, and while it’s never been fully litigated, the league pressured the Raiders to eventually return to Oakland branding history and the Chargers faced enormous blowback keeping “Los Angeles.” It’s unlikely to be a hard block, but the league could make the Bears’ identity in Indiana murky and uncomfortable — and the McCaskeys know the “Chicago Bears” brand is worth enormous amounts.
Scheduling Disadvantages / Primetime Leverage
Less formal but real — the NFL controls primetime slots. A team that just burned its #3 market on a controversial state-line hop could find itself getting far fewer Sunday/Monday night games. That’s TV revenue. It’s petty but it’s real.
“Exhaust Local Options” Requirement
The NFL’s relocation guidelines explicitly require teams to demonstrate they’ve made a good-faith effort to reach a stadium solution in their current market before the league will approve a move. The NFL could argue the Bears short-circuited the Illinois process — Illinois was reportedly close to a deal and the Bears themselves asked Springfield to pause the hearing on the megaproject bill to “tweak” it. If the Bears killed their own deal, the NFL has cover to say the good-faith standard wasn’t met.
OT: Stadium Update
State representative Kam Buckner, who has been spearheading negotiations on the stadium issues, joined 104.3 The Score’s Mully & Haugh on Friday to discuss the stadium bill, and he believes a resolution is going to come quickly. “As the old church folks used to say, ‘Soon and very soon,’” Buckner said when asked about a possible deadline. “I don’t know exactly when we’re going to get this done, but listen, when I say we’re on the punch list stuff, we are there. We got another day here in Springfield where we’re going to hammer some other things out. Next week is a big week for us…I think we’ll have some good news in short order.”
Even Twitter will be struggling to accurately relay all the transactions, so this shall be an open thread to follow moves.
roy_OTC@TexansCap Daniel Hardy signed a two-year contract with the Chicago Bears worth a base value of $4.97 million with $2.45 million guaranteed at signing.
Aaron Leming@AaronLemingNFL After this move, the #Bears roster sits at 53. Not counting draft class, etc, they’re now at $25.313M in cap space.
Thus far, I’ve been sorta right. “Cheap” C. Maybe a DT/DE. Brisker, DJ, Edmunds, Brisker…via con dios.
You know I’m not exactly a Poles-truther [shoulda been fired with Flus], but he’s not Pace at least. He tends to show discipline while taking chances on Side B players like Dayo, Jarrett, even Sweat with mixed results. One may counter, “Ah, but Thuney was premier, as was Dalman.” Well, Poles only ponied up a 4rth for Thuney and didn’t exactly overpay Dalman who retired anyways. OTOH, Pace likely throws two 1st rounders and DJ for Maxx Crosby or backs up the Brinks’ truck for Trey Hendrickson.
I simply don’t see that in Poles’ DNA. He’s not a rapper at a strip-club making it rain. He’s more like the frugal business man waiting for the 2-for-1 lapdance specials on a Tuesday. It could happen, but I’ll be surprised.
As such, I don’t exactly believe Poles will land a Peppers-Mack tier player. If the right situation pops, perhaps, but I suspect Poles isn’t going to leverage the future like his predecessors. His job isn’t on the line this year.
Poles will practice due diligence. He monitored the price of Crosby, Linderbaum and McGovern and swiped left.
I’m certain Poles will gauge the market on Hendrickson, Phillips, Carter…or other possible trade partners not on the radar, but my gut tells me he stays the course, keeps his cap and draft picks, then ‘settles’ for more B-sides maximum potential and flexibility. No doubt not splurging will rile up the natives. Doing your taxes cleanly isn’t sexy.
One other major difference between 2024 and 2026 is Ben Johnson; he, not Eberflus, is the fail-safe. Maybe even the boss like Tony Soprano while Poles is merely the puppet-boss Junior, in which case, I have much more hope considering the results of 2024 vs 2025.
So, excuse me while I doom scroll at the Bada Bing between “Cherry Pie” and “Girls Girls Girls”…
Welcome to Hammond, Indiana — Please Watch Your Step (and Your Air Quality)
Let’s talk about the Wolf Lake site, because nobody covering this story with knee pads seems to want to. The Bears’ preferred location — the Lost Marsh Golf Course near 129th Street and Calumet Avenue — is roughly 18 miles southeast of Soldier Field. It sits next to the BP Whiting Refinery, the largest oil refinery in the Midwest. It was built over an old industrial landfill. Drilling crews have already been out there flagging buried water and gas lines.
Wolf Lake itself has a history that would make even the most enthusiastic real estate agent wince. Gangsters used it as a body disposal site in the 1920s and 30s. It was the dumping ground for a murder victim in the infamous Leopold and Loeb case in 1924. And now, in 2026, Hammond Mayor Thomas McDermott Jr. stood before a committee and, reportedly choking up with emotion, declared it a “once-in-a-generation opportunity.” Maybe he was choking on the shit backing up in his colon.
He’s not wrong. It really is a once-in-a-generation opportunity — to commit a historic, billion-dollar environmental boondoggle.
The environmental remediation alone on a site like this — industrial landfill, proximity to a major refinery, underground pipelines, contaminated soil — could easily add hundreds of millions to the project cost. The Bears’ own “due diligence” is still ongoing. Nobody knows what’s actually down there yet. The Indiana bill doesn’t even nail down who pays for cost overruns. What starts as a $3 billion project has every hallmark of a $7-8 billion disaster in the making once you factor in cleanup, infrastructure, litigation, and the inevitable moment when someone finds something truly nasty underground. And when that bill comes due, you can bet the state of Indiana — and the taxpayers of Lake County — will be staring at it. See how eager they are when the Casinos tell them to eat it and pony up. Who knows, Trump may destroy the EPA by then and it’s a non-problem. Just make sure your health insurance is good before attending a game.
Indiana is committing roughly $1 billion in public funds, to be financed through a cocktail of admissions taxes, food-and-beverage taxes, and hotel taxes. Sound familiar? It should. It’s almost exactly the same structure as the Arlington Heights deal the Bears couldn’t get Illinois to finalize. Except it’s on a landfill. Next to a refinery. In a state that already has an NFL franchise in Indianapolis whose fans are now being asked to welcome a second team that will compete with them for everything from sponsorships to media attention.
Colts fans: how does Kevin’s dick taste?
The NFL Blackout Problem Nobody Is Talking About
Here’s something the excitement-drunk Hammond boosters and Bears beat reporters apparently haven’t gotten around to mentioning: the Chicago media market.
The Bears currently play in Chicago. Their entire fanbase — the people who buy tickets, the people who fill the stadium, the people who make home games sellouts — live in the Chicago metro area. Move the team 18 miles across a state line into Hammond, Indiana, and you have now placed the franchise outside the Chicago market for NFL broadcasting purposes.
Under NFL blackout rules, if games in Hammond don’t sell out, Chicago can no longer be blacked out — because Chicago isn’t in the team’s home market anymore. You’ve now created a situation where Bears fans in Chicago have every incentive to stay home and watch on TV rather than make the trek to Hammond. And if attendance struggles, the revenue projections underpinning the entire Indiana financing structure start to look like they were written on a cocktail napkin. In a casino.
Kevin Warren seems to have bet that Bears fans will follow the team anywhere. That is a fascinating assumption to make about a fanbase that has been historically loyal despite decades of organizational incompetence — but loyalty has limits. Driving into Indiana, past a refinery, to sit in a dome built on a landfill, to watch a team that no longer officially calls your city home? Some fans will do it. Many won’t. Chicago may show balls and petition the NFL to remove the city’s name from the team. A lawsuit they should easily win. Hammond Bears? Sounds like some shit microbrew.
George McCaskey: A Portrait in Incompetence — and Desperation
Let’s dispense with sympathy entirely and talk about what’s actually driving George McCaskey, because it isn’t football. It was never football.
Virginia McCaskey, the Bears’ matriarch and daughter of George Halas, did what wealthy patriarchs and matriarchs always do when they want to avoid estate taxes while keeping peace at the Thanksgiving table: she distributed ownership shares across the family. Thin slices — 3%, 4%, 5% here and there — handed out to children and grandchildren who, by and large, care about the Chicago Bears the way you care about a stock ticker. They don’t go to games. They don’t watch film. They watch their bank accounts.
Virginia is gone now. And those shareholders — the entitled, football-indifferent beneficiaries of the Halas family legacy — have made their position clear to George: generate cash flow or we sell. Not to just anyone, either. There are buyers circling. The Ryan family, among others, has the capital and the appetite to start quietly accumulating those minority shares until someone wakes up one morning and realizes the McCaskey era is over not with a dramatic sale but with a slow-motion death by a thousand small transactions. George was probably instructed by Virginia in her last days to not allow that to happen.
George McCaskey knows this. He knows the only thing standing between him and irrelevance is a revenue stream large enough to keep the restless shareholders fat and happy; exactly one thing generates that kind of cash flow fast enough to matter: a casino.
Not a stadium. A casino.
The “football town” vision — the restaurants, the retail, the hotels, the entertainment district — is the polite version of what this is actually about. The Bears have been in conversations about casino licensing as part of the Arlington Heights development for years. A stadium-adjacent casino, in a state with regulated gambling, attached to one of the NFL’s most historic franchises, in the Chicago metro area, would generate revenue that dwarfs anything the stadium itself produces. That’s the cash cow that keeps the fractious McCaskey shareholders from selling their slices to the highest bidder.
Which raises a question nobody in the compliant Bears media wants to ask: is the Hammond move real, or is it a pressure play designed to finally shake loose a casino license from Illinois that the state has been reluctant to grant? Because if Illinois caves — if they pass the infrastructure bill, freeze the property taxes, and throw in a casino license to keep the Bears in Arlington Heights — George McCaskey gets everything he needs to pacify his shareholders without Kevin Warren driving the franchise into a landfill.
And if it’s not a pressure play? If Warren genuinely wants Hammond? Then George McCaskey is a man so thoroughly outmaneuvered by his own President that he’s about to sacrifice the family’s century-old franchise on the altar of Kevin Warren’s ego and his own shareholders’ vacation home mortgages. George Halas is screaming at Virginia right now up in the clouds.
Image via Associated Press (AP)
Last year, the Matt Eberflus debacle — firing the head coach at halftime of a game the Bears were losing badly, one of the most publicly humiliating in-season firings in NFL history — prompted Colin Cowherd and others to name McCaskey among the worst owners in the league. The hiring of Ben Johnson and the emergence of Caleb Williams as a generational quarterback gave Bears fans genuine hope. But ask yourself: why did the Bears suddenly get competent on the field right when the franchise value conversation got interesting? A team with a generational QB, fresh off a playoff run, in a massive media market, is worth considerably more to a potential buyer than a perennial doormat. George McCaskey, whether by accident or design, presides over a franchise at peak valuation — right at the moment the stadium situation threatens to crater it.
He’s not a villain. He’s not clever enough to be a villain. He’s a man in over his head, surrounded by family members who want their money, manipulated by a President running his own agenda, and apparently unable to see that the exit Warren is steering toward leads directly off a cliff. Warren, a man the Big 10 couldn’t shed fast enough
Kevin Warren’s Long Con
Kevin Warren has been running a masterclass in institutional manipulation since he arrived. His open letter framing the Bears as benevolent private investors who are simply asking for “basic infrastructure” while demanding $850-950 million in public funds was, as one analyst put it, a semantic trick — and it worked beautifully on most of the Chicago sports media.
Now he’s done it again. The Bears were apparently in productive negotiations with Illinois as recently as Wednesday, February 19th — a three-hour session that Governor Pritzker described as “very positive.” The Bears then canceled Thursday’s committee hearing — which, according to Pritzker, was at the Bears’ request — and almost simultaneously dropped a statement praising Indiana’s SB27 as the most meaningful step forward in their stadium history. The blog that covers Springfield politics talks about Pritziker wanting things like affordability in ticket prices so average people can attend, and Warren responds by not showing up to meetings and putting power plays. Maybe Warren will scream “but the Dow is at 50,000!”
That is not negotiating in good faith. That is a man executing a plan while the other party thinks they’re having a conversation.
Whether Warren genuinely wants to be in Hammond or is using Indiana as a gun to Illinois’ head, the damage to the relationship with Illinois is real. And if he actually follows through with Hammond — landfill, refinery, Colts country, blackout rules, and all — then he will have maneuvered George McCaskey into presiding over a historic blunder that will define this franchise forever. And with the gravity of the decision, it’s really forever. The Chicago Bears are destroyed by a guy that was given the lowest approval by Big Ten athletic directors in Big 10 history.
George is handing him the matches. Kevin is already holding the gasoline.
The Hype Machine: Who’s Driving the Narrative?
Within minutes of the Indiana House Ways and Means Committee vote on Thursday, the Bears media ecosystem lit up like a pinball machine. Ben Devine of @Chicago_NFL — one of the more widely-followed Bears accounts — was declaring “The Chicago Bears are indeed moving to Northwest Indiana” and “Breaking: The Chicago Bears plan to commit $2 billion toward building their new stadium near Wolf Lake in Hammond, Indiana” before the ink was dry, before any site due diligence was complete, before anyone had answered the rather important question of who pays for cleaning up an industrial landfill next to the Midwest’s largest oil refinery.
“Indeed moving.” Not “may be moving.” Not “are signaling a move.” Indeed moving. Done deal. Pack your bags, Chicagoland.
Now, a few questions worth sitting with.
When a media personality with a large Bears following unilaterally declares a franchise relocation a fait accompli based on a committee vote and a carefully worded team statement that doesn’t actually commit to anything — is that journalism? Is it analysis? Or is it something else?
When that same breathless certainty is echoed almost simultaneously across multiple Bears-adjacent accounts, all amplifying the same narrative of inevitability — is that organic reaction? Or does it look, at least a little, like a coordinated pressure campaign designed to make Illinois lawmakers feel like the train has already left the station? It would be fun to look at Devine’s checking account and see if perhaps he’s on the dole.
Who benefits when Bears fans panic-share “they’re definitely leaving” posts that flood Springfield legislators’ inboxes and social feeds? Who benefits when the move feels so inevitable that Illinois is stampeded into a desperate, unfavorable deal — or, alternatively, when Illinois folds entirely and Warren gets everything he wanted?
Here’s what we know: Kevin Warren has already demonstrated that he is willing to use media framing as a negotiating weapon. His “open letter” reframed an $850 million public subsidy ask as a modest request for “basic infrastructure.” The Bears canceled an Illinois committee hearing — at their own request, per Pritzker — and within the same news cycle had a statement praising Indiana ready to go. That is not spontaneous. That is choreographed.
So when the same media cycle that amplifies Warren’s every press release starts declaring the move definitive, based on nothing more than a framework bill that doesn’t even specify financing terms — it’s worth asking who is writing the script, and who is simply reading it.
And this isn’t just a matter of Devine being enthusiastic or credulous. In December, he posted a claim that has since ricocheted across Bears social media as established fact: that Illinois is “demanding” the Bears pay for roads and infrastructure, framing it as something “even more rare” than a team privately funding its own stadium — as if Illinois were the aggressor shaking down a good-faith franchise.
This is not a matter of interpretation. It is factually inverted. It’s a lie and Devine is a liar.
Illinois is not demanding the Bears pay for infrastructure. Illinois is declining to pay $850 million in infrastructure costs for the Bears. Those are opposite things. The Bears chose a site that lacked existing infrastructure — in large part because that’s why the land was cheap — and are asking the state to cover the gap. Illinois saying “we’re not sure we want to spend $850 million on that” is not an unreasonable shakedown. It is a government weighing whether a near-billion-dollar expenditure is in the public interest, especially while taxpayers still owe $350 million on the 2003 Soldier Field renovations the Bears demanded and then abandoned.
Szymanski amplified it. Others amplified it further. By the time it reached the average Bears fan’s timeline, Illinois had been cast as the villain demanding the franchise privately fund its own roads — a cartoonishly unreasonable position that the state never actually took.
That’s how the machine works. Warren frames it. Devine broadcasts it. Szymanski validates it. The myth calcifies into conventional wisdom before anyone checks the receipts.
Devine may be entirely sincere. He may genuinely believe what he posts. But sincerity and accuracy are different things. And a media environment where “Bears insider” accounts race to validate Warren’s narrative without interrogating it — without mentioning the landfill, the refinery, the blackout rules, the Colts fans who didn’t ask for a roommate, the $7-8 billion remediation risk — isn’t covering the story. It’s becoming part of the story.
Bears fans deserve better than hype merchants dressed up as analysts. The franchise’s future is too important to be left to people whose loudest skill is hitting “post” fast.
FAFO, the MAGA Chorus, and the Ghost of Sweaty Teddy Phillips
Scroll through any Bears stadium comment section right now and you’ll find a particular species of intellectual wildlife repeating the same three syllables with the enthusiasm of someone who just learned what an acronym is: FAFO. Fuck around and find out. Illinois fucked around. Now they’re finding out.
It’s catchy. It’s also historically illiterate, politically motivated, and being fed to the internet knuckle-draggers by people who know exactly what they’re doing.
Let’s start with the history since the FAFO crowd apparently skipped it.
Twenty-plus years ago, the Bears — under their previous CEO Ted Phillips, a man so perspiration-prone that the nickname “Sweaty Teddy” wasn’t even mean, it was just accurate — took the late Mayor Richard M. Daley to the absolute woodshed. The 2002 Soldier Field renovation was a masterpiece of civic fleecing. The Bears got a brand new stadium shell dressed up in the bones of a historical landmark, financed through bonds backed by a 2% Chicago hotel tax. The city and state were told the debt would be manageable. The pandemic gutted hotel revenue. The hotel business never fully recovered. Chicago’s finances, never exactly a model of fiscal health, got worse.
As of early 2024, Illinois taxpayers still owe approximately $589 million in combined principal and interest on that renovation — $375 million in principal, $214 million in interest, with final payment due in 2032. The Bears’ lease at Soldier Field runs through 2033. Meaning: Illinois will finish paying for the Bears’ old stadium approximately one year before the Bears’ legal obligation to play there expires. At which point the Bears will presumably be gone, and Illinois will own a renovated historic venue with no anchor tenant and a $589 million receipt in the drawer.
Sweaty Teddy got his stadium. Stayed on as CEO for decades on the strength of that one negotiating win. And Chicago is still paying for it.
So when Governor Pritzker looks at the Bears coming back to the table with another demand — this time $850 million in infrastructure, a 40-year tax freeze, and a sales tax exemption on construction materials — and says we need to think carefully about this, he isn’t “fucking around.” He is a governor who has watched his state get fleeced once already, who is staring at $589 million in remaining debt from the last time Illinois played ball, and who has some elementary obligation to the taxpayers of his state not to simply bend over and say “thank you, may I have another.”
But here’s where it gets nakedly political. JB Pritzker is widely considered a serious contender for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination. He’s wealthy, he’s governed a major blue state, and he has ambitions that extend well beyond Springfield. The Indiana Republican establishment — Governor Mike Braun, Speaker Todd Huston, and the rest — know this perfectly well. They are not primarily interested in football. They are interested in handing a potential 2028 Democratic presidential candidate a headline that reads: Pritzker Lost the Chicago Bears.
The FAFO chorus in the comment sections isn’t organic Bears fan outrage. It’s astroturfed GOP trolling with a football spin. Indiana Republicans get to look pro-business, pro-growth, and locally triumphant while simultaneously handing their national allies a weapon to use against a Democrat who might be running for president in two years. The Bears are a prop. Pritzker is the target. And the knuckle-draggers happily typing FAFO into YouTube comments are doing exactly what they’ve been primed to do — generate the appearance of popular momentum for a narrative someone else wrote.
None of them will drive to Hammond to watch a game on a Saturday night in January when it’s 14 degrees and the lake effect snow is coming sideways off Lake Michigan.
Halas Hall convincing Bear fans Indiana is actually part of Illinois
But they’ll type FAFO until their fingers fall off, because that’s free, and it’s fun, and someone upstream from them is very pleased that they’re doing it.
Pritzker isn’t a villain in this story. He’s a governor who looked at $589 million in outstanding debt from the last time Illinois gave the Bears what they wanted and concluded — reasonably — that the state should negotiate rather than capitulate. The fact that his political opponents have successfully reframed “fiscal responsibility” as “fucking around” is a testament to how completely Warren’s narrative operation has colonized the discourse.
Sweaty Teddy would be proud.
Illinois Isn’t Blameless
To be fair — and fairness requires acknowledging this — Illinois has been a willing participant in its own humiliation. Pritzker treated this as anything but a priority. The state’s response to years of Bears negotiations has been the governmental equivalent of “yeah, we’ll get to it.” The commercial property tax situation in Illinois is genuinely hostile to major development. The Arlington Heights deal dragged on for three years without resolution.
But none of that changes the fact that the Bears are now seriously contemplating building a $7+ billion stadium complex on an industrial landfill next to a refinery, in a state that has one NFL team already, financed by a public investment structure that is functionally identical to the deals they claimed were unworkable in Illinois — except with substantially more geological and environmental risk.
Illinois failed the Bears. The Bears are about to fail themselves.
The NFL Should Step In — And Chicago Should Play Hardball
Here is something that has gone almost entirely undiscussed in the breathless coverage of Hammond’s “once-in-a-generation opportunity”: the NFL has a vested interest in this deal not happening, and Roger Goodell should say so loudly.
The Chicago market is one of the most valuable in American sports. The Chicago Bears brand — one of the league’s founding franchises, the Monsters of the Midway, the team of Butkus and Payton and Urlacher — derives enormous value from its association with that city. Moving the franchise 18 miles across a state line to a landfill adjacent to a BP refinery in Hammond, Indiana does not make the Chicago Bears more valuable. It makes them a regional curiosity with an identity crisis, competing for attention in a market that now has to share its NFL loyalties with the Indianapolis Colts, who did not ask for a roommate and whose fanbase has been notably unenthusiastic about the prospect.
The league has intervened in stadium situations before. It has influence over where franchises land and how deals are structured. If the NFL is serious about protecting franchise values — and it is, because franchise values are the foundation of every owner’s net worth and every TV deal ever negotiated — then Goodell should be on the phone with Warren and McCaskey telling them that Hammond is not an acceptable outcome for one of the league’s flagship franchises.
But let’s say the league stays quiet, and Warren gets his way. Here’s a card Chicago hasn’t played yet, and should:
The city of Chicago owns the name.
Not legally, perhaps — trademark law is complicated and the Bears have held their marks for decades. But politically and culturally, “Chicago Bears” belongs to Chicago the way “New York Yankees” belongs to New York. If the Bears relocate to Hammond, Indiana, the city of Chicago should immediately and loudly challenge the franchise’s right to continue using the Chicago name. File the legal motions. Make it expensive. Make it embarrassing. Force the NFL and the Bears to litigate in public whether a team playing in Hammond, Indiana gets to trade on the identity and history of a city it just abandoned.
The Hammond Bears.
Say it out loud. Let that land. Think that works for Rodger Goodell? I don’t fucking think so.
Under NFL blackout rules, once the team plays in Hammond, Chicago is no longer the home market. The city cannot be blacked out for games that don’t sell out. Bears fans in Chicago — the actual Bears fans, the ones who grew up with this team, who remember the ’85 season, who endured decades of McMahon and Grossman and Cutler and the rest — will watch from their couches while a stadium built on an industrial landfill in Indiana fills with Indiana residents who six months ago had no interest in the Chicago Bears.
The Hammond Bears. Playing in a dome next to the BP Whiting Refinery. In a city with a population of 70,000. Trying to sell out a 60,000-seat stadium to a fanbase that mostly lives in a different state.
Roger Goodell should be embarrassed that this conversation is even happening. And if it happens, Chicago should make sure the NFL feels every inch of it.
Illinois still has until May 31st to pass legislation. It’s a long shot. The Bears, having now publicly and effusively praised Indiana and called SB27 the most meaningful step forward in their stadium efforts to date, would take a significant credibility hit by pivoting back to Springfield.
But meaningful step forward toward what, exactly? Toward a dome on a landfill next to the BP Whiting Refinery, in a city that borders Chicago but is definitionally not Chicago, in a state that didn’t ask for a second NFL franchise and whose existing NFL fanbase isn’t thrilled about sharing?
Bears fans deserve better than this. Caleb Williams deserves better than this. The franchise, at this particular moment in its history, has more on-field promise than it has had in decades.
And Kevin Warren appears to be steering it directly into Wolf Lake.
George McCaskey, for his part, will probably be surprised when it happens.
Kevin Warren Is Going to Burn It All Down — And George McCaskey Is Handing Him the Matches
Let’s get one thing straight before we dive in: what you’re watching right now isn’t a savvy negotiating tactic. It isn’t leverage. It isn’t a masterclass in business strategy. This is Kevin Warren we are talking about, a guy who was run out of the Big 10 for being an asshole.
What you’re watching is the slow-motion implosion of one of the most storied franchises in NFL history, orchestrated by a President who has confused activity with competence, while the owner nods along from the back seat like a golden retriever on the way to what he doesn’t know is the vet.
Welcome to the Chicago Bears, folks. Kevin Warren is going to become a generational pariah. George Halas will actually try and strangle him when Kevin finally reaches the pearly gates.
The Setup: How We Got Here
Three years ago, the Bears purchased the old Arlington Park horse racing grounds for $200 million. For a brief, shining moment, it looked like the franchise was finally serious about a real stadium — a proper home befitting a team with a century of history. Then the property tax negotiations with Illinois turned into a quagmire, Kevin Warren pivoted back toward the city, then away again, then floated a Soldier Field dome, then pointed at Indiana, and now here we are: the “most meaningful step forward” in Bears stadium history is apparently a golf course built on a landfill, in the shadow of the largest oil refinery in the Midwest.
Congratulations, Bears fans. You waited 40 years for this.
The “Tax Certainty” Con: How to Beg for a Subsidy Without Calling It One
Before we get to Hammond, it’s worth understanding exactly why the Arlington Heights deal collapsed — because the Bears’ PR operation has successfully muddied this water beyond recognition, and the truth is both simpler and more damning than anything read in the awful beat coverage. Damn I wish Adam Hoge would get George’s pecker out his mouth.
When the Bears bought the old Arlington Park property for $200 million, Arlington Heights assessed it the way any local government assesses any newly purchased property: at market value. The resulting tax bill came in around $9 million a year. The Bears negotiated it down to roughly $3 million. Fine. Property owners negotiate tax assessments. That’s legal and normal.
But then the Bears wanted more. Specifically, they wanted to lock in that discounted rate for 40 years — regardless of what they build on the land. I work in Texas and have heavy interaction with the Railroad Commission, who regulate the oil & gas industry down here. Watch the showLandman with Billy Bob and you will know, that proposal is a fucking joke. That gets you laughed out of the room and nobody takes you serious again. Warren is a clown.
And here’s why that matters. In every property tax system in America, if you improve your land, the value gets reassessed. Add a deck to your house, your taxes go up. It’s not punitive. It’s just how it works — the land is worth more because you made it worth more. The Bears are proposing to build not just a stadium but an entire entertainment district: restaurants, retail, hotels, possibly a casino. A football town. Each of those improvements would normally be assessed individually, generating tax revenue for local schools, police, fire departments, and yes — the infrastructure the development requires.
The Bears don’t want that. They want “tax certainty” — which is a beautifully crafted piece of PR language that means: we want to pay a fixed, discounted rate on this land no matter what we build on it, for four decades, so that our tax bill never reflects the actual value of what we’ve created. The city of Arlington Heights can go fuck itself; we want to make Pottersville from “It’s a Wonderful Life” look like a hick backwater town.
When you hear the Bears throw around numbers like $180-200 million in potential annual taxes, understand what that figure represents. That’s the projected total tax burden across all the improvements they plan to build — the stadium, the restaurants, the retail, the hotels, everything. It assumes the full buildout of their football utopia. The stadium alone wouldn’t generate anything close to that. The number is engineered to sound alarming while describing a completely normal outcome for a massive commercial development.
What the Bears are asking for, stripped of the euphemisms, is a 40-year tax break worth hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars — money that won’t go to local schools, won’t fund the police and fire services their development will require, won’t pay for the roads and utilities that their patrons will use. That cost doesn’t disappear. It gets redistributed to everyone else in the tax base. Local residents will see their own property taxes rise to cover services that a Bears-adjacent entertainment district generates demand for, while the Bears themselves pay a rate frozen in the era when the land was an empty horse track.
That is a taxpayer subsidy. It doesn’t appear on any line item labeled “Bears subsidy.” It never will. But that’s what it is.
The state of Illinois understood this and pushed back. Arlington Heights, to its credit, said no. Kevin Warren’s response was to reframe a rejection of a sweetheart tax deal as the state being “obstreperous” and refusing to cooperate on basic infrastructure. The media, by and large, bought it. Hye guys at the Score 670 didn’t but the news people, or what’s left of the Trib and Sun Times, had nothing to say.
Nothing is preventing the Bears from negotiating their property taxes every year, just like every other property owner in Illinois. What they can’t do — what the state correctly refused to allow — is lock in a discounted rate on undeveloped land and carry it forward through a billion-dollar buildout for four decades. That’s not tax negotiation. That’s a blank check written by Illinois taxpayers, signed by people who’ll never see the Bears name on the bill. It’s bullshit, but it’s the kind of bullshit that the State of Indiana seems eager to take on. The lawmakers there must pass around jars of Vaseline to each other.
I rememeber that ’18 NFL Draft when CLE selected Baker Mayfield #1 overall, the Jets selected Sam Darnold #3 overall, while the Bills drafted Josh Allen at #7 banking that he’d be another good ‘project’ like Carson Wentz for the Eagles [‘ 17 Wentz threw for 33TDs/7ints and 101.9 passer rating].
Incidentally, the Bears drafted Roq at #8, Bills drafted Edmunds at #16, Panthers drafted DJ Moore at #24 and Hippy’s adopted son Chosen Rosen went #11 overall.
I remember thinking at the time that both Mayfield and Darnold were ‘can’t miss.’ I loved Mayfield’s mojo to turn around the factory of sadness. I thought Darnold’s steady demeanor and playing in L.A. [USC] suited him well for the intense NY market.
Yet somehow, the Browns and Jets still broke them.
I was a bit more on the fence about Josh Allen. Wentz recency bias made me think big physical ‘projects’ from small schools could work, but man, that’s a gamble [as the Eagles found out].
I wasn’t too sold on Rosen. To me, he was sorta the JJ McCarthy of that draft. Meh.
However, both Mayfield and Darnold “busting” really made me self-evaluate. How could I have been so wrong on both? I didn’t expect either to be sure-fire HOFers, but BUSTS?
I mean one, yeah, stats say QBs are 50/50, but BOTH. Maybe draft picks are no better than taking a spin at the Roulette table.
Well, as it turns out, both Mayfield and Darnold only needed to join functional teams.
Then it hit me. I was wrong, but not in the way I imagined.
I erred in believing in that the philosophy of “pick yourself up by your bootstrap” still applies to QBs. It obviously does NOT.
Like much in life, surrounding greatly impacts results.
This is an old debate: nature-v-nurture.
But it’s not binary.
Browns and Jets have been forever dysfunctional, and as Florio refrains, “dysfunctional teams do dysfunctional things” and this can be macro: owners, GMs, coaches, draft…to micro: developing players, ESP QBs.
Being dysfunctional isn’t a death sentence either. The Bengals, Lions and Bears have also been a laughing stock for 40+ years, yet they seemed to have dug themselves out of the Browns/Jets 9th circle of hell.
I was mistaken in assuming that a single individual, even a QB, can simply will himself to be an Ubermench regardless of circumstance.
One might be tempted to retort, “Well, Brady and Mahomes would’ve been great no matter.” Really? What if the Chris Palmer Browns drafted Brady and the Pace-Nagy Bears drafted Mahomes?
This works the other way as well. A successful organization doesn’t automatically generate HOF QBs like some GPT prompt.
Reid in KC could only go so far with Alex Smith. The same Pats who won 6 SBs drafted Mac Jones. 9ers traded the house for Trey Lance.
Oops!
I suppose this is a long-winded way of stating the obvious:
It takes both nature+nurture=success.
The formula isn’t written in stone. Who knows about the ratio. 80% to 20% or vice versa.
But USUALLY [outliers do exist] it is some ratio of both.
This SB marks the first time two top 5 [drafted] QBs square-off. That’s a remarkable stat given the ENORMOUS amount of resources that go into finding a franchise QB.
It illustrates how fickle the whole process really is, how maybe one seemingly minute factor could set off a whole butterfly effect.
Terry Bradshaw’s life literally came down to a coin flip. Steelers won. They drafted Bradshaw, and after a disastrous start he rebounded to win 4 SBs.
The Bears traded their #2 to the Green Bay Packers for veterans Lee Roy Caffey, Bob Hyland, and Elijah Pitts translating to squat.
If Bears win coinflip and draft Bradshaw…well, you elder-fans tell me if it results in 4 SBs…
“We can look forward to causing havoc to the league next year.” DJ Moore after accepting the NFL’s Moment of the Year award, recognizing the game-winning touchdown in overtime against the Packers. pic.twitter.com/934iVrtIFI
I think I’ve been right in every pick [except in Bears over Rams, but I can live with that].
I think SEA’s D is simply too dominant to allow such a young QB (who’s been a playoff TO machine) to excel.
When a D has a legit nickname [The Darkside], you know they’re good!
There’s a risk that Darnold will Darnold, but thus far he really hasn’t [outside Rams]. If he starts seeing ghosts again, it’ll be one epic chokejob.
On top of that, SEA has a great one-two punch at HB, plus a dangerous returner and solid specials with sound coaching.
The Pats’ Dline is real, but how tight will the refs call this game? A lot of times they allow WAAAAY more holding [and PIs] than usual in the SB, which may mitigate the Pats’ biggest advantage.
As such, I predict a slow, tight game, but with huge SEA momentum surges which will be too much for a relatively inexperienced Pats’ team.
Darnold gets his ultimate vindication while the Queens are stuck with #9 watching the SB in a Cancun bar….
Like most, gonna be busy for a few days, so just wanna give a quick thanks to all the regs [and lurkers] for being part of a special season no matter how it ends; though obviously, a SB would make it magical!
So enjoy the eggnog, crazy uncles and football games. Cheers.
Packers Final Injury Report Out: RB MarShawn Lloyd (calf/hamstring), TE Josh Whyle (concussion), G John Williams (back).[Parsons – OUT OUT]
Questionable: RB Chris Brooks (chest), DE Brenton Cox (groin), DE Kingsley Enagbare (illness), RB Josh Jacobs (knee/ankle), T/G Darian Kinnard (neck), DE Collin Oliver (hamstring), RT Zach Tom (knee/back), WR Christian Watson (chest/shoulder), WR Dontayvion Wicks (ankle), S Evan Williams (knee).
Note: Oliver, Cox and John Williams have been designated for return from injured reserve and are within their 21-day practice windows.
Bears Final Injury Report Out: WR Luther Burden III (ankle), WR Rome Odunze (foot), LB Amen Ogbongbemiga (hamstring).
Questionable: DE Joe Tryon-Shoyinka (personal), LB Tremaine Edmunds (groin), TE Cole Kmet (ankle/knee), RB D’Andre Swift (groin).
Note: Edmunds has been designated for return from injured reserve and is within his 21-day practice window
Naturally, Micah Parsons [ACL tear, 9 month recovery] out plus Christian Watson and Josh Jacobs as Questionable are tremendous losses. Even if Jacobs and Watson suit up, they can’t possibly be anywhere close to 100%.
Bears without Rome/Burden sucks as well, but Bears are a run first, 12 personnel team at heart, so all Zaccheus, Duvernay and Walker have to do is stay upright, block, and catch occasionally.
I think BJ will be smart enough to target DJ, Loveland and Kmet on key downs.
What I really want to write about though is that for the first time since maaaybe ’18, I believe the Bears can finish – not just with a winning record, or Wild Card appearance – but with a SB. The ’25 Bears can win it all.
Yes – all. The whole enchilada. The whole 9 yards. The entire shebang or whatever other phrases exist for them winning a SB.
It’s a confluence of many factors.
1. No real super-team this season. Week in, week out, I have witnessed playoff teams ‘upset’. Whether it’s Pats losing to Raiders, Pack losing to Browns, Rams losing to Panthers, Bills losing to Dolphins, Broncos losing to Chargers, etc it’s one of those years where seemingly any team can indeed beat any favorite any given Sunday. So why not us?
2. Bears find different ways to win in crunch time.
Whether it’s a QB scramble, a big KR, a blocked FG, a forced fumble, an incredible INT, improbable throw/catch, or bruising runs to close, the Bears just get ‘er done. By now, they simply BELIEVE they will win. How barely matters. They’ve essentially been in playoff mode since week 3 [Cowboys], so a little pressure isn’t going to phase them.
3. Bears’ formula wins late season.
Don’t know if you noticed, but it’s getting pretty freaking freezing out there. Luckily, the Bears are a run first team. The 1-2 punch of Swift-Monangai is now spoken in the same breath as Gibbs-Monty, Kyle Williams-Corum while The Oline ranks top 5 on many sites. And, oh yeah, they have two great blocking TEs in Kmet/Loveland.
Caleb Williams is arguably the best scrambler too which I appreciate even more after watching Stafford-v-Darnold on TNF.
Another part of the Bears’ formula is they don’t turn it over much.
Caleb rarely throws INTs, actually breaking the record for fewest INTs through the first 1K passing attempts. Unlike his predecessors , [looking at you Smoking Jay], he rarely gets strip-sacked [or even sacked].
Swift also doesn’t fumble much while Monangai at Rutgers attempted 669 rushes with ZERO fumbles.
So Bears don’t give away many freebies.
Which dovetails well with CREATING defensive TOs. #1 in NFL with 20, and #2 Texans aren’t even close with 14.
I, like many, was initially skeptical about Bears’ D keeping it up. As they say, TOs are unpredictable – not a good bet; nevertheless, Dennis Allen has made it just that – bankable. Somehow, someway, that D forces INTs/Fumbles, and they create momentum to win especially in hostile environments.
19.7% of the Bears' defensive drives have ended in a turnover
Run fiercely+ block well+ limit TOs+ Force TOs= Wins
Oh, and they’re clutch!
4. Bears have elite coaching.
Wow. Can’t believe I just typed that. I’m having an out of body experience just reading that aloud.
Bears have elite coaching for the first time since Zubas were cool; I TRUST our brains outsmarting theirs.
The easy example is Ben Johnson which doesn’t need much explaining, but Dennis Allen may actually be doing a superior job at DC given what he has.
It’s not just them either. Look at the incredible turnaround of the Oline in just one season. Gotta give props to Dan Roushar for that.
The secondary is playing out of its mind, big pat of the back [to future HC] Al Harris.
Def Line coach Jeremy Garrett may even be sneaky good. Sweat has quietly notched 8.5 sacks, Booker in 7 games has 3 sacks, while the run D has recovered from being a sieve early season.
via Matt Marton/Imagn I don’t really believe in ‘moral losses’, but sometimes, they do happen. After Philly, many still claimed Bears were “fun frauds”. However, after nearly stealing a win at Lambeau, the league no longer scoffs.
I compared this team to both the SB winning Saints and Gmen; the Gmen in their finale took the Pats to the limit, ultimately losing 38-35.
Now you figure, ‘wow, tough loss. Gut punch and no way to lurch into the playoffs’, but it was quite the opposite.
“I know what everybody wrote and what everybody said we should do (against the Pats) and all the experts. Well, these are the same people that said we weren’t going to be in this position (10-6) and be in the playoffs, so we really don’t care what they say…[Antonio] Pierce [continued]. “All the experts supposedly said we were going to get beat by 20 or 30 points or whatever it was. That came down to the last couple minutes of the game.”
“With that mentality, again we are going into a place where our backs are going to be against the wall, where we play our best. And I hope we can go out there and show it off.”
Sound familiar? Let’s hope history repeats. No reason it can’t.
Happy [Early] Turkey Day! Or if you’re vegetarian, Tofurkey Day which actually can double as a football if you play Thanksgiving ball like me and my friends used to.
Rev reminded me of the Fog Bowl, so if you’re feeling nostalgic, click here.
As of Weds, the Eagles are still missing RT Lane Johnson. Given how impactful Montez Sweat has been since the bye, that’s absolutely a favorable Bears’ matchup.
As for the Bears, eyes are on Jaylon Johnson and Kyler Gordon finally returning. Honestly though, how much of a ‘downgrade’ is Nashon Wright from JJ? JJ has dropped some relatively easy INTs, you think he makes some of those spectacular Wright high-points? Wright was also in prime position to end the Steelers’ game at the end if Brisker doesn’t tip it. You have the same confidence JJ INTs that?
Meanwhile all CJ Gardner-Johnson has done is everything. What does Gordon do better besides strain something?
These are real questions Dennis Allen must answer soon, and maybe Ryan Poles down the line with the cap and trying to nab and pay a premiere rusher like Jefferey Simmons or Myles Garrett.
The Eagles’ O doesn’t turn it over, so this is strength vs strength. I think the last time the Bears lost the turnover battle [Ravens], they lost the game. So we’ll see which unit imposes its will. #1 No TO Eagles’ O – or #1 TO Bears’ D.
Their run game has struggled though. They avg 3.9 per rush, 2.30 yds before contact, and rank 24rth in EPA in last 3 weeks. Flus actually used a 5-man “Bear” front to stuff Saquon Barkley, and I can easily see Dennis Allen following suit with Brisker, Sewell, Jackson, or Gordon[?] and CJ off the corners. Granted, Cowboys had Quinnen Williams, but Grady Jarrett has looked healthier as of late.
The wildcard will be Jaylen Hurts scrambling; the Bears have struggled vs running QBs like Dart, Huntley, etc and are down to PS squad tier LBs who bit on every misdirection vs Steelers, but as the Giants found out the hard way, that’s a risky gameplan. Bears’ D flies and lays the wood hunting for TOs.
On D, we all know the Eagles’ Dline is to envy. We are well aware that Poles drafted Darnell Wright instead of Jalen Carter, and that Carter has played at an AP level and is arguably a top 3 DT which we can fantasize about.
However, the Bears’ Oline has totally rebounded from ’24 and has become an asset coming off a strong game vs Steelers where Ozzy Trapilo stepped in and looked the part.
Update on how the #Bears' OL ranks by PFF grading:
• Joe Thuney: 6th for LG • Drew Dalman: 3rd for C • Jonah Jackson: 5th for RG • Darnell Wright: 4th for RT
With Ozzy Trapilo coming off a 75.0 graded game at LT….they might have found their one missing piece. pic.twitter.com/SbzULK2Eko
Caleb struggling under pressure raises an eyebrow. Would like to see him make aggressive Ds pay, but what QB doesn’t struggle under pressure?
Caleb Williams was pressured on only 8 of 37 dropbacks Sunday (22%), the lowest rate he has faced in a game this season. The protection was big as Williams was just 1-of-6 for 4 yards under duress.
One thing that could be a gamechanger though is that the Vikings brought edge blitzers to stifle the stretch run and contain Caleb.
The Eagles’ Dline is talented enough to not need to blitz, which means Fangio will use all kinds of exotic coverages to confuse Caleb. If there’s a rush in his face on top of that, could be a long Black Friday for Caleb.
Here’s a concise game preview by Bears Now.
Think Trac said Bears would have to get two turnovers and score over 30 to win this game.
My response, “So, basically, another Bears’ game.”
It’s gotten to that point in the season where we don’t have to wonder all that much what teams are.
The Bears are a feisty, sloppy, opportunistic team with the most dangerous weapon of all:
BELIEF
They BELIEVE that if it’s close, no matter how slow, penalty-ridden, or miscued through 3 QTRs – no matter if the opposing team blocked a punt/FG, returned for a TD, strip-sacked TD, are averaging 6 yards per play, or if they’re down to 20 players because lighting struck their sideline…these Bears believe they’ll close it out regardless.
That’s a 180 from the floundering Fluses which found ways to lose.
Bears are a scary team to face even if you are the reigning champs and favorited Eagles. Bears are playing with house $ while the entire Philly hate-machine has been pounding on them all season especially after a brutal blown game against their hated rival Cowboys.
Overtime:
Couple odd stats for Bears.
1. No QB with such an awful comp% wins as much as Caleb Williams. It’s not even all that close really:
Caleb Williams has completed less than 60% of his passes in seven games this season.
In those games, the Bears are 7-0.
All other teams this season when their QB is below 60% passing (min. 20 attempts)?
2. Bears are also -3 point differential total the whole season. Apparently only the 1987 Chargers were worse through 11 games.
[Any old-timers recall the ’87 Chargers?]
I mentioned this before, but this Bears’ team reminds me a lot of the ’22 Vikings when they made that crazy 13-4 run with Kirk Cousins. Felt like every week was that scene from “Airplane”, “Looks like I picked the wrong time to quit sniffing glue!”
[2023 Vikings? 7-10]
The 2025 Chicago Bears are fun frauds! Nothing we can do but enjoy before the train wreck.
Then add that the Bears’ D allows 5.77 YPP [20th], 26.5 PPG [27th] yet still count on at least 2+TOs per game [1st], and one can understand why many persist the Bears are “Fun Frauds.”
It’ll be up to Bears to finally silence the doubters; after all, the only difference between “fun frauds” and epic “Cinderellas” is winning.